Compare towns
Phillips vs Saco vs Burnham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Maine.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Phillips has the most kids (20.7% under 18).
Saco has grown the fastest since 2010 (+10.3%).
Burnham has the most affordable homes ($178k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Phillips | Saco | Burnham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,094 |
20,819Highest |
953Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -12.6%Lowest ME: +2.6% |
+10.3%Highest ME: +2.6% |
-5.8% ME: +2.6% |
| Median age | 49.7±3.7Highest 11% above ME |
44.9±1.5Lowest about the ME average |
48.4±3.2 8% above ME |
| Phillips and Burnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 20.7%±5.1Highest ME: 18.1% |
16.7%±2.5Lowest ME: 18.1% |
16.8%±4.7 ME: 18.1% |
| Phillips and Burnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 21.3%±2.1 ME: 22.4% |
18.5%±2.1Lowest ME: 22.4% |
22.2%±3.1Highest ME: 22.4% |
| Burnham and Phillips are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 20.7%Lowest ME: 36.2% |
43.5%Highest ME: 36.2% |
20.8% ME: 36.2% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.9%±2.6 ME: 5.8% |
5.2%±1.2Highest ME: 5.8% |
2.7%±2.2Lowest ME: 5.8% |
| Saco and Phillips are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $45,385±$12kLowest 39% below ME |
$92,241±$11kHighest 23% above ME |
$59,261±$18k 21% below ME |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $190,800±$18k 36% below ME |
$413,100±$17kHighest 39% above ME |
$178,100±$43kLowest 40% below ME |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $483±$377Lowest 58% below ME |
$1,249±$385 10% above ME |
$1,308±$386Highest 15% above ME |
| Burnham and Saco are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $2,582 15% below ME |
$4,807Highest 58% above ME |
$1,897Lowest 38% below ME |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 40.4%±33Lowest ME: 48.4% |
50.3%±14 ME: 48.4% |
60.9%±49Highest ME: 48.4% |
| Burnham and Saco are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 17.7%Highest ME: 10.7% |
6.4%Lowest ME: 10.7% |
13.6% ME: 10.7% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 83.3% ME: 74.3% |
72.8%Lowest ME: 74.3% |
87.8%Highest ME: 74.3% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1974Lowest 3 yrs older than ME |
1982 5 yrs newer than ME |
1983Highest 6 yrs newer than ME |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 23 min 8% below ME |
24 minHighest 3% below ME |
22 minLowest 13% below ME |
| Work from home | 16.8%±7Lowest ME: 15.9% |
19%±3.6Highest ME: 15.9% |
17%±10.9 ME: 15.9% |
| Saco and Burnham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #38 of 133 in ME | — |
| School district | RSU 58/MSAD 58 | Saco Public Schools | — |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
ME average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.