Compare towns
Peacham vs Tunbridge vs Montgomery
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Peacham has the most renters (23.9% rent).
Tunbridge has grown the fastest since 2010 (+4.1%).
Montgomery has the oldest population (median age 51.5).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Peacham | Tunbridge | Montgomery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 887Lowest |
1,253Highest |
1,047 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -2.3%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+4.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-1.4% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 50.1±5.7 16% above VT |
42.7±8.3Lowest about the VT average |
51.5±11.3Highest 19% above VT |
| Montgomery and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 20.7%±6 VT: 17.9% |
21.1%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
15.5%±4.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Tunbridge and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 33.6%±2.6 VT: 21.4% |
20.9%±1.6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
33.9%±8.2Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Montgomery and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 48.9% VT: 43.8% |
42.9%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
52.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.4%±4Highest VT: 7% |
3.6%±2 VT: 7% |
2.8%±3.2Lowest VT: 7% |
| Peacham and Tunbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $90,000±$28kHighest 11% above VT |
$89,464±$26k 10% above VT |
$53,289±$24kLowest 34% below VT |
| Peacham and Tunbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $302,000±$64kLowest 5% below VT |
$315,300±$23k about the VT average |
$323,200±$45kHighest about the VT average |
| Montgomery and Tunbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,028±$248 17% below VT |
$1,346±$128Highest 9% above VT |
$868±$209Lowest 30% below VT |
| Tunbridge and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,605Highest 11% above VT |
$4,645 8% below VT |
$4,326Lowest 14% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 66.7%±17.7Lowest VT: 48.4% |
76.7%±100Highest VT: 48.4% |
76.6%±68 VT: 48.4% |
| Tunbridge and Montgomery are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 10.6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
14.4% VT: 10.1% |
15.6%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 76.1%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
84.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
80.7% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1976Lowest same as VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1980 4 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 31 min 31% above VT |
31 minLowest 31% above VT |
37 minHighest 58% above VT |
| Work from home | 24.2%±16.9 VT: 16.9% |
25.8%±8.2Highest VT: 16.9% |
16%±5.9Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Tunbridge and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Peacham School District | First Branch Unified School District #82 | Northern Mountain Valley Unified Union School District #85 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.