Compare towns

Peacham vs Reading vs Stoneham vs Barnet

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Reading has the most homeowners (84.9%).
Stoneham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+8.4%).
Barnet has the most affordable homes ($248k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasurePeachamReadingStonehamBarnet
People
Population
887
699Lowest
23,355Highest
1,855
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
-2.3%
U.S.: +7.4%
+3.2%
U.S.: +7.4%
+8.4%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
-2.6%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
Median age
50.1±5.7
29% above U.S.
51.1±7.6Highest
31% above U.S.
42.2±2.2Lowest
8% above U.S.
47.7±5.3
23% above U.S.
Reading and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
20.7%±6
U.S.: 22%
18.5%±4.2Lowest
U.S.: 22%
20.8%±2.5
U.S.: 22%
21.6%±4.9Highest
U.S.: 22%
Barnet and Stoneham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
33.6%±2.6Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
28.2%±3.3
U.S.: 17.2%
20.4%±2.2Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
28.8%±3.8
U.S.: 17.2%
Peacham and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
48.9%
U.S.: 35.7%
46%
U.S.: 35.7%
55.9%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
35.6%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
5.4%±4Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
3.1%±2.5
U.S.: 6.4%
4.7%±1.4
U.S.: 6.4%
1%±0.9Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
Peacham and Stoneham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$90,000±$28k
11% above U.S.
$85,000±$19k
5% above U.S.
$113,964±$10kHighest
41% above U.S.
$67,386±$15kLowest
17% below U.S.
Stoneham and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$302,000±$64k
9% below U.S.
$377,200±$72k
13% above U.S.
$671,900±$26kHighest
102% above U.S.
$247,900±$24kLowest
25% below U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,028±$248
27% below U.S.
$1,100±$331
22% below U.S.
$2,035±$142Highest
44% above U.S.
$974±$72Lowest
31% below U.S.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$5,605
80% above U.S.
$5,754
84% above U.S.
$6,523Highest
109% above U.S.
$4,489Lowest
44% above U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
66.7%±17.7Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
63.3%±31.7
U.S.: 51.1%
41.9%±8.2Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
59.3%±29.9
U.S.: 51.1%
Peacham and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
10.6%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
8.4%
U.S.: 12.5%
5.4%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
8.2%
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
76.1%
U.S.: 65.2%
84.9%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
71%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
79.9%
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1976Highest
4 yrs older than U.S.
1969
11 yrs older than U.S.
1964Lowest
16 yrs older than U.S.
1974
6 yrs older than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
31 min
17% above U.S.
33 minHighest
25% above U.S.
28 min
5% above U.S.
28 minLowest
5% above U.S.
Work from home
24.2%±16.9
U.S.: 15.1%
22.9%±10.6
U.S.: 15.1%
24.6%±3.6Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
13.3%±4.5Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
Stoneham and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — — #117 of 282 in MA —
School district Peacham School District Mountain Views Unified Union School District #76 Stoneham Caledonia Cooperative Unified School District #78
High school in town None in town None in town Stoneham High None in town
Students per teacherat that high school — —
10.7
—
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.