Compare towns
Orange vs Warwick vs Windsor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Orange has the youngest population (median age 41.8).
Warwick has the most people working from home (22.4%).
Windsor has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Orange | Warwick | Windsor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 7,573Highest |
776Lowest |
2,060 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -3.4%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
0% U.S.: +7.4% |
+3.5%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 41.8±2.2Lowest 7% above U.S. |
51.4±7.3Highest 32% above U.S. |
44.6±12.3 15% above U.S. |
| Warwick and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 22.2%±3.8Highest U.S.: 22% |
9.9%±3.4Lowest U.S.: 22% |
21.1%±8.8 U.S.: 22% |
| Orange and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.3%±3.1Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
23.2%±3.3 U.S.: 17.2% |
29.2%±8Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Windsor and Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 15.7%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
40.5%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
40% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2%±0.9 U.S.: 6.4% |
2.4%±2.1Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
1.2%±1.4Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Warwick and Orange are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $55,824±$10k 31% below U.S. |
$93,333±$22kHighest 16% above U.S. |
$51,197±$4kLowest 37% below U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $245,900±$18k 26% below U.S. |
$349,400±$34kHighest 5% above U.S. |
$170,300±$22kLowest 49% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $775±$233Lowest 45% below U.S. |
$1,367±$163Highest 3% below U.S. |
$1,002±$107 29% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,136Lowest 33% above U.S. |
$4,380 40% above U.S. |
$4,878Highest 56% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 41%±11.9Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
33.3%±57.3 U.S.: 51.1% |
31.4%±20Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Orange and Warwick are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 22.4%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
5%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
7.8% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 70% U.S.: 65.2% |
89%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
51.6%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1966 14 yrs older than U.S. |
1974Highest 6 yrs older than U.S. |
1938Lowest 42 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 min 24% above U.S. |
40 minHighest 52% above U.S. |
22 minLowest 16% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 6.6%±2.8Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
22.4%±6.9Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
6.6%±4.7Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #275 of 282 in MA | — | #61 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Orange · Ralph C Mahar | Warwick | — |
| High school in town | Ralph C Mahar Regional | None in town | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.0 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.