Compare towns
Orange vs Warren vs Worcester
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Orange has the most affordable homes ($246k median).
Warren has the most expensive homes ($334k median).
Worcester has the most people working from home (23.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Orange | Warren | Worcester |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 7,573Highest |
5,009 |
831Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -3.4%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
-3.1%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-3.4%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 41.8±2.2 7% above U.S. |
38.7±7.3Lowest about the U.S. average |
47±2.7Highest 21% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 22.2%±3.8Highest U.S.: 22% |
20.8%±8 U.S.: 22% |
12.8%±3.9Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Orange and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.3%±3.1Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
14.6%±4.5Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
19.5%±2.5 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Orange and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 15.7%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
23.2% U.S.: 35.7% |
53%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2%±0.9Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.9%±2.1 U.S.: 6.4% |
6.9%±4.7Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Worcester and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $55,824±$10kLowest 31% below U.S. |
$66,082±$6k 18% below U.S. |
$73,833±$18kHighest 9% below U.S. |
| Worcester and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $245,900±$18kLowest 26% below U.S. |
$333,700±$35kHighest about the U.S. average |
$271,100±$27k 19% below U.S. |
| Warren and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $775±$233Lowest 45% below U.S. |
$890±$174 37% below U.S. |
$1,023±$136Highest 28% below U.S. |
| Worcester and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,136Lowest 33% above U.S. |
$4,530Highest 45% above U.S. |
$4,421 42% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 41%±11.9Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
29.7%±18.4 U.S.: 51.1% |
25.5%±37Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Orange and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 22.4%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
9% U.S.: 12.5% |
5.9%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 70% U.S.: 65.2% |
64.5%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
85.9%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1966Lowest 14 yrs older than U.S. |
1975 5 yrs older than U.S. |
1976Highest 4 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 min 24% above U.S. |
33 minHighest 25% above U.S. |
29 minLowest 9% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 6.6%±2.8Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
8.5%±5.4 U.S.: 15.1% |
23.6%±4.8Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #275 of 282 in MA | #165 of 282 in MA | — |
| School district | Orange · Ralph C Mahar | Quaboag Regional | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 |
| High school in town | Ralph C Mahar Regional | Quaboag Regional High | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.0Lowest |
10.0Highest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.