Compare towns
Nottingham vs Sugar Hill
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Nottingham has the most kids (23.9% under 18).
Sugar Hill has grown the fastest since 2010 (+14.9%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Nottingham | Sugar Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||
| People | ||
| Population | 5,357Highest |
658Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +9.3%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
+14.9%Highest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 38.8±6.7Lowest 10% below NH |
60.8±2.1Highest 40% above NH |
| Kids under 18 | 23.9%±5.4Highest NH: 18.2% |
10.3%±3.5Lowest NH: 18.2% |
| Age 65+ | 18.4%±4.2Lowest NH: 20.1% |
37.2%±12.7Highest NH: 20.1% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.9%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
59%Highest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.9%±2.6Highest NH: 6% |
2%±3.1Lowest NH: 6% |
| Nottingham and Sugar Hill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Cost of living | ||
| Household incomemedian | $122,201±$20kLowest 23% above NH |
$154,091±$32kHighest 56% above NH |
| Sugar Hill and Nottingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $457,500±$26kLowest 14% above NH |
$639,700±$50kHighest 59% above NH |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $2,068±$1kHighest 39% above NH |
$1,208±$630Lowest 19% below NH |
| Nottingham and Sugar Hill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,319Lowest 10% above NH |
$7,340Highest 10% above NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 92.1%±44.9Highest NH: 48.2% |
40%±100Lowest NH: 48.2% |
| Nottingham and Sugar Hill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Below poverty line | 1.4%Highest NH: 7.2% |
0.9%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | ||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 94.3%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
95.4%Highest NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1992Highest 13 yrs newer than NH |
1964Lowest 15 yrs older than NH |
| Getting to work | ||
| Average commuteone way | 34 minHighest 27% above NH |
26 minLowest about the NH average |
| Work from home | 22.2%±5.8Highest NH: 16.8% |
16.8%±4.8Lowest NH: 16.8% |
| Nottingham and Sugar Hill are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Schools | ||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #15 of 120 in NH | — |
| School district | Nottingham School District | — |
| High school in town | None in town | — |
| On TownTapestry | ||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.

