Compare towns
Nottingham vs Bow vs Danville
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Nottingham has the youngest population (median age 38.8).
Bow has the highest household income ($173k).
Danville has the most affordable homes ($438k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Nottingham | Bow | Danville |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 5,357 |
8,335Highest |
4,531Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +9.3% NH: +4.6% |
+9.4%Highest NH: +4.6% |
+0.5%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 38.8±6.7Lowest 10% below NH |
41.5±2 4% below NH |
42±4Highest 3% below NH |
| Danville and Bow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 23.9%±5.4 NH: 18.2% |
25%±3.6Highest NH: 18.2% |
21.6%±7Lowest NH: 18.2% |
| Bow and Nottingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 18.4%±4.2Highest NH: 20.1% |
17.6%±2.5Lowest NH: 20.1% |
18.1%±4.8 NH: 20.1% |
| Nottingham and Danville are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.9% NH: 40.6% |
60.3%Highest NH: 40.6% |
36.6%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.9%±2.6Highest NH: 6% |
5.6%±1.9 NH: 6% |
1.4%±1.3Lowest NH: 6% |
| Nottingham and Bow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $122,201±$20k 23% above NH |
$172,857±$16kHighest 75% above NH |
$115,104±$21kLowest 16% above NH |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $457,500±$26k 14% above NH |
$506,500±$34kHighest 26% above NH |
$437,600±$26kLowest 9% above NH |
| Bow and Nottingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $2,068±$1k 39% above NH |
$1,539±$178Lowest 3% above NH |
$2,144±$867Highest 44% above NH |
| Danville and Nottingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,319Lowest 10% above NH |
$9,584Highest 44% above NH |
$8,504 28% above NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 92.1%±44.9Highest NH: 48.2% |
39%±13.2Lowest NH: 48.2% |
70.2%±61.6 NH: 48.2% |
| Nottingham and Danville are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 1.4%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
2.7% NH: 7.2% |
12.1%Highest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 94.3% NH: 72.8% |
87.5%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
97.4%Highest NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1992 13 yrs newer than NH |
1985Lowest 6 yrs newer than NH |
1993Highest 14 yrs newer than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 34 min 27% above NH |
27 minLowest about the NH average |
35 minHighest 30% above NH |
| Work from home | 22.2%±5.8 NH: 16.8% |
22.7%±4.7Highest NH: 16.8% |
13.1%±5.4Lowest NH: 16.8% |
| Bow and Nottingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #15 of 120 in NH | #26 of 120 in NH | #40 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Nottingham School District | Bow School District | Timberlane Regional School District |
| High school in town | None in town | Bow High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 12.8 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.


