Compare towns
Norwich vs Rupert vs Putney
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Norwich has grown the fastest since 2010 (+5.8%).
Rupert has the oldest population (median age 57.8).
Putney has the most affordable homes ($300k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Norwich | Rupert | Putney |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 3,640Highest |
676Lowest |
2,622 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +5.8%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-2.2% VT: +2.8% |
-3.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 40.8±3.2 5% below VT |
57.8±9.7Highest 34% above VT |
37.2±5.2Lowest 14% below VT |
| Kids under 18 | 24%±5.1Highest VT: 17.9% |
13.9%±3.7Lowest VT: 17.9% |
15.4%±4.1 VT: 17.9% |
| Norwich and Putney are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 16%±3.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
42.3%±8.1Highest VT: 21.4% |
18.1%±3.8 VT: 21.4% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 81%Highest VT: 43.8% |
30.6%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
48.6% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.8%±2.4 VT: 7% |
2.1%±2.5Lowest VT: 7% |
20.4%±3.4Highest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $140,313±$12kHighest 73% above VT |
$88,229±$36k 9% above VT |
$79,706±$18kLowest about the VT average |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $637,500±$76kHighest 101% above VT |
$362,500±$63k 14% above VT |
$300,000±$44kLowest 5% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,460±$322Highest 18% above VT |
— | $508±$482Lowest 59% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $10,000+Highest at least 98% above VT |
$4,594Lowest 9% below VT |
$5,313 5% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 30.7%±19.9 VT: 48.4% |
20%±100Lowest VT: 48.4% |
54.2%±19.4Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Putney and Norwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 2.8%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
6% VT: 10.1% |
16%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 71.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
93.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
72.8% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1982Highest 6 yrs newer than VT |
1955Lowest 21 yrs older than VT |
1977 1 yr newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 19 min 19% below VT |
27 minHighest 14% above VT |
18 minLowest 24% below VT |
| Work from home | 21%±5.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
18.6%±9.2 VT: 16.9% |
16.9%±6.5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Norwich and Rupert are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #1 of 70 in VT | — | #32 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Norwich School District | — | Windham Southeast Unified Union School District #96 |
| High school in town | None in town | — | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.