Compare towns
Northfield vs Pittsford vs Proctor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Northfield has the most expensive homes ($274k median).
Pittsford has the oldest population (median age 47.7).
Proctor has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.3%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Northfield | Pittsford | Proctor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 5,920Highest |
2,892 |
1,794Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -4.7%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-4.3% VT: +2.8% |
+1.3%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 36.4±4.1Lowest 16% below VT |
47.7±6.3Highest 11% above VT |
42.4±6.4 about the VT average |
| Pittsford and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.6%±3.7Lowest VT: 17.9% |
15.1%±5.2 VT: 17.9% |
21.8%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Proctor and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20%±3.8Lowest VT: 21.4% |
25.4%±6.1Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.4%±2.5 VT: 21.4% |
| Pittsford and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 34.6% VT: 43.8% |
37%Highest VT: 43.8% |
28.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 15.1%±2.1Highest VT: 7% |
3%±2.1Lowest VT: 7% |
3.6%±1.7 VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $71,768±$13k 12% below VT |
$69,705±$7kLowest 14% below VT |
$74,167±$12kHighest 9% below VT |
| Proctor and Northfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $274,400±$21kHighest 13% below VT |
$197,000±$33kLowest 38% below VT |
$209,900±$17k 34% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,018±$207 18% below VT |
$781±$167Lowest 37% below VT |
$1,029±$202Highest 17% below VT |
| Proctor and Northfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,878Highest 3% below VT |
$3,378Lowest 33% below VT |
$4,032 20% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 63.3%±17.7Highest VT: 48.4% |
18.5%±12.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
37.3%±16.2 VT: 48.4% |
| Northfield and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 12.5% VT: 10.1% |
11.3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
16.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 73.5%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
80.6% VT: 73.2% |
86.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1956 20 yrs older than VT |
1972Highest 4 yrs older than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 27 minHighest 16% above VT |
25 min 7% above VT |
22 minLowest 6% below VT |
| Work from home | 12.1%±4.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
10.1%±6.9 VT: 16.9% |
9.4%±4.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Northfield and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #42 of 70 in VT | #54 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Paine Mountain Union School District #68 | Otter Valley Unified Union School District #53 | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 |
| High school in town | Northfield Middle/High School | None in town | Proctor Junior/Senior High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 10.0Highest |
— | 8.7Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.