Compare towns
Newton vs Guildhall vs Dunbarton
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Newton has the most people working from home (18.1%).
Guildhall has the most affordable homes ($321k median).
Dunbarton has the most expensive homes ($484k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Newton | Guildhall | Dunbarton |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,836Highest |
371Lowest |
3,097 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.7%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
— | +9%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 47.8±5.7 23% above U.S. |
42.6±7.8Lowest 10% above U.S. |
48±3.7Highest 23% above U.S. |
| Dunbarton and Newton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.1%±4.3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
22.6%±7.5Highest U.S.: 22% |
19.8%±3.8 U.S.: 22% |
| Guildhall and Dunbarton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 16%±3Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
26.1%±5.5Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
20.4%±4.3 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Guildhall and Dunbarton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37.9% U.S.: 35.7% |
33.9%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
39.6%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.7%±2.5Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
1.1%±3.1Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
3.8%±2 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Newton and Dunbarton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $138,487±$29kHighest 72% above U.S. |
$115,000±$46kLowest 42% above U.S. |
$124,348±$21k 54% above U.S. |
| Newton and Dunbarton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $459,500±$18k 38% above U.S. |
$321,200±$62kLowest 3% below U.S. |
$484,100±$33kHighest 46% above U.S. |
| Dunbarton and Newton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,683±$96Highest 19% above U.S. |
$850±$717Lowest 40% below U.S. |
$1,166±$70 17% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $8,124 160% above U.S. |
$4,625Lowest 48% above U.S. |
$8,233Highest 164% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 62%±41.8 U.S.: 51.1% |
75%±100Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
54.7%±60.7Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Guildhall and Newton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.5% U.S.: 12.5% |
11.9%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
3%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 90.1%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
93.7% U.S.: 65.2% |
95.1%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1983 3 yrs newer than U.S. |
1958Lowest 22 yrs older than U.S. |
1990Highest 10 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 min 15% above U.S. |
25 minLowest 5% below U.S. |
34 minHighest 27% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 18.1%±5.2Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
2.3%±2.2Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
12.6%±5.4 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Newton and Dunbarton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #70 of 120 in NH | — | #33 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Sanborn Regional School District | — | Dunbarton School District |
| High school in town | None in town | — | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.