Compare towns
New Haven vs Pittsfield vs Wallingford
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
New Haven has the most expensive homes ($379k median).
Pittsfield has the most people working from home (28.1%).
Wallingford has grown the fastest since 2010 (+2.4%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | New Haven | Pittsfield | Wallingford |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,792 |
391Lowest |
2,286Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -2.5% VT: +2.8% |
-7.7%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+2.4%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 48±3.9 11% above VT |
53.8±3.5Highest 25% above VT |
45.9±10.8Lowest 6% above VT |
| Pittsfield and New Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.1%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
13.6%±8.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
18.7%±5Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Wallingford and New Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.2%±2.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
30.4%±7.1Highest VT: 21.4% |
23.9%±3.2 VT: 21.4% |
| Pittsfield and Wallingford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 31.8% VT: 43.8% |
45.4%Highest VT: 43.8% |
30.3%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 0.9%±0.9Lowest VT: 7% |
2.8%±3.5Highest VT: 7% |
1.5%±1.1 VT: 7% |
| Pittsfield and Wallingford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $92,321±$17kHighest 14% above VT |
$65,852±$12kLowest 19% below VT |
$80,230±$15k about the VT average |
| New Haven and Wallingford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $379,300±$19kHighest 20% above VT |
$313,300±$73k about the VT average |
$261,900±$44kLowest 17% below VT |
| New Haven and Pittsfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,163±$143Highest 6% below VT |
$1,035±$140 16% below VT |
$891±$95Lowest 28% below VT |
| New Haven and Pittsfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,967Highest 18% above VT |
$5,181 about the VT average |
$4,355Lowest 14% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 20.1%±6.7 VT: 48.4% |
35.6%±43Highest VT: 48.4% |
14.3%±13.5Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Pittsfield and New Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 3.1%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
8.4%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 78.2% VT: 73.2% |
76.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
82.5%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1977 1 yr newer than VT |
1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 22 min 7% below VT |
19 minLowest 18% below VT |
25 minHighest 6% above VT |
| Work from home | 17.8%±5.8 VT: 16.9% |
28.1%±24.1Highest VT: 16.9% |
7.1%±3.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Pittsfield and New Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Mt. Abraham Unified School District #61 | — | Mill River Unified Union School District #52 |
| High school in town | None in town | — | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.