Compare towns
New Gloucester vs Wilder vs Poland
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
New Gloucester has the highest household income ($109k).
Wilder has grown the fastest since 2010 (+81.7%).
Poland has the most people working from home (21.9%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | New Gloucester | Wilder | Poland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 5,766 |
3,087Lowest |
5,954Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +2.4%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+81.7%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+9.9% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 40.1±5.5Lowest 3% above U.S. |
45.5±8.9Highest 17% above U.S. |
44.2±9.4 14% above U.S. |
| Wilder and Poland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 24.2%±5.8Highest U.S.: 22% |
11.8%±4.1Lowest U.S.: 22% |
21.4%±5.6 U.S.: 22% |
| New Gloucester and Poland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 15.4%±4.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
27.3%±4.4Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
17.8%±4.3 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 30.7% U.S.: 35.7% |
60.2%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
23.8%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.3%±2.1Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
8.1%±3.9Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
4.2%±2.8 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Wilder and Poland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $108,797±$12kHighest 35% above U.S. |
$75,143±$9kLowest 7% below U.S. |
$85,557±$23k 6% above U.S. |
| New Gloucester and Poland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $357,100±$29kHighest 7% above U.S. |
$273,200±$18kLowest 18% below U.S. |
$283,600±$44k 15% below U.S. |
| New Gloucester and Poland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,150±$249 19% below U.S. |
$1,142±$451Lowest 19% below U.S. |
$1,198±$128Highest 15% below U.S. |
| Poland and New Gloucester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,417 10% above U.S. |
$5,505Highest 76% above U.S. |
$2,774Lowest 11% below U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 24.7%±12Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
39.9%±17.2 U.S.: 51.1% |
61.6%±30.7Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Poland and Wilder are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.3%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
9.3% U.S.: 12.5% |
16.6%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 82.9%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
62.9%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
81.9% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1991Highest 11 yrs newer than U.S. |
1983Lowest 3 yrs newer than U.S. |
1988 8 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 27 min about the U.S. average |
17 minLowest 37% below U.S. |
28 minHighest 6% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 14.2%±6.5 U.S.: 15.1% |
12.6%±6.7Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
21.9%±10.6Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Poland and New Gloucester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #65 of 133 in ME | — | #81 of 133 in ME |
| School district | RSU 15/MSAD 15 | — | RSU 16 |
| High school in town | None in town | — | Poland Regional H S |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 12.2 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.