Compare towns
Naugatuck vs Putnam vs Prospect
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Connecticut.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Naugatuck has the most people working from home (15%).
Putnam has the most renters (40.2% rent).
Prospect has the most homeowners (93.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Naugatuck | Putnam | Prospect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 31,800Highest |
9,292Lowest |
9,458 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -1.1% CT: +0.9% |
— | — |
| Median age | 39.8±2.4Lowest 3% below CT |
43.7±3 6% above CT |
46.8±3.9Highest 14% above CT |
| Prospect and Putnam are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.9%±2.3 CT: 20.2% |
18.6%±3.6Lowest CT: 20.2% |
21.4%±4.1Highest CT: 20.2% |
| Prospect and Naugatuck are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 15.6%±2Lowest CT: 18.5% |
18.5%±3.1 CT: 18.5% |
24.5%±4.3Highest CT: 18.5% |
| Prospect and Putnam are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 32.2% CT: 42.5% |
20%Lowest CT: 42.5% |
40.3%Highest CT: 42.5% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 7.8%±1.7Highest CT: 7.1% |
3.9%±1.4 CT: 7.1% |
3.5%±1.8Lowest CT: 7.1% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $96,324±$9k about the CT average |
$70,561±$7kLowest 26% below CT |
$126,394±$18kHighest 32% above CT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $259,100±$13kLowest 29% below CT |
$269,200±$11k 27% below CT |
$355,400±$21kHighest 3% below CT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,369±$58 8% below CT |
$1,149±$44Lowest 23% below CT |
$1,800±$433Highest 21% above CT |
| Prospect and Naugatuck are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,362 4% below CT |
$3,860Lowest 42% below CT |
$6,504Highest about the CT average |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 42.2%±9.4 CT: 52.6% |
37.7%±11.6Lowest CT: 52.6% |
45.3%±31.8Highest CT: 52.6% |
| Prospect and Naugatuck are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 6.3% CT: 10% |
11.5%Highest CT: 10% |
3.2%Lowest CT: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 67.8% CT: 66.5% |
59.8%Lowest CT: 66.5% |
93.5%Highest CT: 66.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971 4 yrs newer than CT |
1961Lowest 6 yrs older than CT |
1974Highest 7 yrs newer than CT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 minHighest 26% above CT |
25 minLowest 6% below CT |
28 min 4% above CT |
| Work from home | 15%±2.8Highest CT: 16% |
9%±2.8Lowest CT: 16% |
10.1%±3.2 CT: 16% |
| Naugatuck and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #116 of 149 in CT | #128 of 149 in CT | #50 of 149 in CT |
| School district | Naugatuck School District | Putnam School District | Regional School District 16 |
| High school in town | Naugatuck High School | Putnam High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 15.2Highest |
9.5Lowest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
CT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.