Compare towns
Mount Tabor vs Ripton vs Landgrove vs Danby
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Mount Tabor has the oldest population (median age 57.8).
Ripton has the youngest population (median age 47.7).
Landgrove has the most expensive homes ($759k median).
Danby has the most affordable homes ($272k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Mount Tabor | Ripton | Landgrove | Danby |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||||
| People | ||||
| Population | 304 |
508 |
225Lowest |
1,133Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | +25.7%Highest VT: +2.8% |
— | -2.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 57.8±10.6Highest 34% above VT |
47.7±14.2Lowest 11% above VT |
56.9±12.8 32% above VT |
52.6±4.8 22% above VT |
| Mount Tabor and Landgrove are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Kids under 18 | 10.2%±6.1Lowest VT: 17.9% |
11.8%±6.3 VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±10.8Highest VT: 17.9% |
14.6%±3.4 VT: 17.9% |
| Landgrove and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Age 65+ | 42.4%±18.1Highest VT: 21.4% |
30.5%±7.1 VT: 21.4% |
36.9%±15.1 VT: 21.4% |
24.3%±2.6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Mount Tabor and Landgrove are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 34.9% VT: 43.8% |
48% VT: 43.8% |
91.2%Highest VT: 43.8% |
34.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.6%±4Lowest VT: 7% |
20.1%±6.3Highest VT: 7% |
2.7%±2.7 VT: 7% |
2.5%±1.9 VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | ||||
| Household incomemedian | — | $112,917±$15k 39% above VT |
$195,938±$167kHighest 141% above VT |
$77,321±$13kLowest 5% below VT |
| Landgrove and Ripton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $420,500±$76k 33% above VT |
$394,400±$61k 25% above VT |
$759,400±$157kHighest 140% above VT |
$272,400±$41kLowest 14% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $2,143±$367Highest 74% above VT |
— | — | $794±$166Lowest 36% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,233 4% above VT |
$4,915 about the VT average |
$10,000+Highest at least 98% above VT |
$4,543Lowest 10% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 0%±100Lowest VT: 48.4% |
52.9%±100Highest VT: 48.4% |
0%±100Lowest VT: 48.4% |
41.4%±34.6 VT: 48.4% |
| Ripton and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Below poverty line | 11%Highest VT: 10.1% |
8.6% VT: 10.1% |
0.4%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
9.4% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | ||||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 92.3% VT: 73.2% |
90.9% VT: 73.2% |
94.4%Highest VT: 73.2% |
89.3%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1946Lowest 30 yrs older than VT |
1973 3 yrs older than VT |
1979 3 yrs newer than VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | ||||
| Average commuteone way | 46 minHighest 94% above VT |
24 min about the VT average |
23 minLowest about the VT average |
30 min 26% above VT |
| Work from home | 10.4%±8.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
17.2%±8.7 VT: 16.9% |
17.6%±7.7Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.1%±5.1 VT: 16.9% |
| Landgrove and Ripton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Schools | ||||
| School district | — | Addison Central Unified Union School District #55 | — | Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 |
| High school in town | — | None in town | — | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | ||||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.