Compare towns
Mount Tabor vs Randolph vs Rupert
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Mount Tabor has the most expensive homes ($421k median).
Randolph has the youngest population (median age 40.4).
Rupert has the most people working from home (18.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Mount Tabor | Randolph | Rupert |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 304Lowest |
4,843Highest |
676 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | -0.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-2.2%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 57.8±10.6Highest 34% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
57.8±9.7Highest 34% above VT |
| Kids under 18 | 10.2%±6.1Lowest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
13.9%±3.7 VT: 17.9% |
| Randolph and Rupert are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 42.4%±18.1Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
42.3%±8.1 VT: 21.4% |
| Mount Tabor and Rupert are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 34.9% VT: 43.8% |
40.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
30.6%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.6%±4Lowest VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
2.1%±2.5 VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | — | $76,758±$6kLowest 5% below VT |
$88,229±$36kHighest 9% above VT |
| Rupert and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $420,500±$76kHighest 33% above VT |
$278,700±$38kLowest 12% below VT |
$362,500±$63k 14% above VT |
| Mount Tabor and Rupert are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $2,143±$367Highest 74% above VT |
$1,172±$173Lowest 5% below VT |
— |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,233Highest 4% above VT |
$4,698 7% below VT |
$4,594Lowest 9% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 0%±100Lowest VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
20%±100 VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Rupert are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 11%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.7% VT: 10.1% |
6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 92.3% VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
93.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1946Lowest 30 yrs older than VT |
1971Highest 5 yrs older than VT |
1955 21 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 46 minHighest 94% above VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
27 min 14% above VT |
| Work from home | 10.4%±8.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
18.6%±9.2Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Rupert and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #55 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | — | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | — |
| High school in town | — | Randolph Union High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.