Compare towns
Mount Holly vs Proctor vs Danby
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Mount Holly has grown the fastest since 2010 (+12%).
Proctor has the most affordable homes ($210k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Mount Holly | Proctor | Danby |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,415 |
1,794Highest |
1,133Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +12%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+1.3% VT: +2.8% |
-2.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 53.5±8.2Highest 24% above VT |
42.4±6.4Lowest about the VT average |
52.6±4.8 22% above VT |
| Mount Holly and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.2%±5 VT: 17.9% |
21.8%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
14.6%±3.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Proctor and Mount Holly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28%±4.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.4%±2.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
24.3%±2.6 VT: 21.4% |
| Mount Holly and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 41.9%Highest VT: 43.8% |
28.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
34.8% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.5%±1.2Lowest VT: 7% |
3.6%±1.7Highest VT: 7% |
2.5%±1.9 VT: 7% |
| Proctor and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $78,015±$19kHighest 4% below VT |
$74,167±$12kLowest 9% below VT |
$77,321±$13k 5% below VT |
| Mount Holly and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $296,900±$40kHighest 6% below VT |
$209,900±$17kLowest 34% below VT |
$272,400±$41k 14% below VT |
| Mount Holly and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,534±$1kHighest 24% above VT |
$1,029±$202 17% below VT |
$794±$166Lowest 36% below VT |
| Mount Holly and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,926Lowest 22% below VT |
$4,032 20% below VT |
$4,543Highest 10% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 65.9%±65.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
37.3%±16.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
41.4%±34.6 VT: 48.4% |
| Mount Holly and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 11.9% VT: 10.1% |
16.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
9.4%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 92.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
86.7%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
89.3% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1984Highest 8 yrs newer than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1981 5 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 27 min 13% above VT |
22 minLowest 6% below VT |
30 minHighest 26% above VT |
| Work from home | 12.2%±6.5Highest VT: 16.9% |
9.4%±4.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.1%±5.1 VT: 16.9% |
| Mount Holly and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Ludlow Mt. Holly Unified Union School District #83 | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 | Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 |
| High school in town | None in town | Proctor Junior/Senior High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 8.7 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.