Compare towns
Mount Holly vs Danby vs Salisbury
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Mount Holly has grown the fastest since 2010 (+12%).
Danby has the most affordable homes ($272k median).
Salisbury has the shortest commute (19 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Mount Holly | Danby | Salisbury |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,415Highest |
1,133Lowest |
1,200 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +12%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-2.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+7.5% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 53.5±8.2Highest 24% above VT |
52.6±4.8 22% above VT |
50.6±6.5Lowest 17% above VT |
| Mount Holly and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.2%±5Highest VT: 17.9% |
14.6%±3.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
16.6%±3.2 VT: 17.9% |
| Mount Holly and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28%±4.6 VT: 21.4% |
24.3%±2.6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
30.4%±2.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Salisbury and Mount Holly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 41.9%Highest VT: 43.8% |
34.8% VT: 43.8% |
34.6%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.5%±1.2Lowest VT: 7% |
2.5%±1.9Highest VT: 7% |
1.6%±1.1 VT: 7% |
| Danby and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $78,015±$19k 4% below VT |
$77,321±$13kLowest 5% below VT |
$99,688±$21kHighest 23% above VT |
| Salisbury and Mount Holly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $296,900±$40k 6% below VT |
$272,400±$41kLowest 14% below VT |
$306,900±$51kHighest 3% below VT |
| Salisbury and Mount Holly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,534±$1kHighest 24% above VT |
$794±$166Lowest 36% below VT |
$1,443±$984 17% above VT |
| Mount Holly and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,926Lowest 22% below VT |
$4,543 10% below VT |
$4,842Highest 4% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 65.9%±65.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
41.4%±34.6 VT: 48.4% |
31.9%±22.6Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Mount Holly and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 11.9%Highest VT: 10.1% |
9.4% VT: 10.1% |
4.6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 92.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
89.3% VT: 73.2% |
88.7%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1984Highest 8 yrs newer than VT |
1981 5 yrs newer than VT |
1967Lowest 9 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 27 min 13% above VT |
30 minHighest 26% above VT |
19 minLowest 20% below VT |
| Work from home | 12.2%±6.5Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.1%±5.1 VT: 16.9% |
6%±2.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Mount Holly and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Ludlow Mt. Holly Unified Union School District #83 | Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Addison Central Unified Union School District #55 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.