Compare towns
Montgomery vs Rochester vs Peacham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Montgomery has grown the fastest since 2010 (-1.4%).
Rochester has the most people working from home (40.8%).
Peacham has the most kids (20.7% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Montgomery | Rochester | Peacham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,047 |
1,389Highest |
887Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -1.4%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-3.5%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-2.3% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 51.5±11.3 19% above VT |
53.3±7.6Highest 24% above VT |
50.1±5.7Lowest 16% above VT |
| Rochester and Montgomery are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 15.5%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
10.4%±3.3Lowest VT: 17.9% |
20.7%±6Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Peacham and Montgomery are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 33.9%±8.2Highest VT: 21.4% |
31.5%±3.1Lowest VT: 21.4% |
33.6%±2.6 VT: 21.4% |
| Montgomery and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 52.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
49% VT: 43.8% |
48.9%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.8%±3.2 VT: 7% |
0.4%±0.6Lowest VT: 7% |
5.4%±4Highest VT: 7% |
| Peacham and Montgomery are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $53,289±$24kLowest 34% below VT |
$72,676±$8k 11% below VT |
$90,000±$28kHighest 11% above VT |
| Peacham and Rochester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $323,200±$45kHighest about the VT average |
$253,600±$81kLowest 20% below VT |
$302,000±$64k 5% below VT |
| Montgomery and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $868±$209Lowest 30% below VT |
$929±$158 25% below VT |
$1,028±$248Highest 17% below VT |
| Peacham and Rochester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,326 14% below VT |
$3,977Lowest 21% below VT |
$5,605Highest 11% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 76.6%±68Highest VT: 48.4% |
62.4%±27.8Lowest VT: 48.4% |
66.7%±17.7 VT: 48.4% |
| Montgomery and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 15.6% VT: 10.1% |
18.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
10.6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 80.7% VT: 73.2% |
86.1%Highest VT: 73.2% |
76.1%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1980Highest 4 yrs newer than VT |
1967Lowest 9 yrs older than VT |
1976 same as VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 37 minHighest 58% above VT |
27 minLowest 17% above VT |
31 min 31% above VT |
| Work from home | 16%±5.9Lowest VT: 16.9% |
40.8%±27.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
24.2%±16.9 VT: 16.9% |
| Rochester and Peacham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Northern Mountain Valley Unified Union School District #85 | Rochester Stockbridge Unified School District #81 | Peacham School District |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.