Compare towns
Montgomery vs Hooksett vs Enosburgh
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Montgomery has the oldest population (median age 51.5).
Hooksett has the highest household income ($118k).
Enosburgh has the most affordable homes ($223k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Montgomery | Hooksett | Enosburgh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,047Lowest |
15,057Highest |
2,804 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -1.4%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+10.6%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
— |
| Median age | 51.5±11.3Highest 32% above U.S. |
41.3±1.5 6% above U.S. |
40.6±3.9Lowest 4% above U.S. |
| Montgomery and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 15.5%±4.4Lowest U.S.: 22% |
17.4%±2.9 U.S.: 22% |
21%±4.2Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Enosburgh and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 33.9%±8.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
17.3%±2.4Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
17.9%±3.3 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 52.8%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
39.6% U.S.: 35.7% |
20.1%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.8%±3.2Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
8.9%±1.6Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
5.4%±2.4 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Hooksett and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $53,289±$24kLowest 34% below U.S. |
$117,962±$11kHighest 46% above U.S. |
$63,828±$17k 21% below U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $323,200±$45k about the U.S. average |
$407,000±$26kHighest 22% above U.S. |
$223,100±$39kLowest 33% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $868±$209 39% below U.S. |
$1,661±$206Highest 18% above U.S. |
$852±$87Lowest 40% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,326 39% above U.S. |
$6,554Highest 110% above U.S. |
$3,624Lowest 16% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 76.6%±68Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
41.7%±16.4Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
48.9%±11.2 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Montgomery and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 15.6%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
3.3%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
13.9% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 80.7%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
80.6% U.S.: 65.2% |
75.7%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1980 same as U.S. |
1988Highest 8 yrs newer than U.S. |
1972Lowest 8 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 37 minHighest 41% above U.S. |
27 minLowest about the U.S. average |
32 min 21% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 16%±5.9Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
13.4%±3.1 U.S.: 15.1% |
10.1%±4.4Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Montgomery and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #30 of 120 in NH | #26 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Northern Mountain Valley Unified Union School District #85 | Hooksett School District | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Enosburg Falls Middle/High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 10.4 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.