Compare towns

Meredith vs Ogunquit vs Randolph vs Gilford

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Meredith has the most renters (24.2% rent).
Ogunquit has the most people working from home (43.3%).
Randolph has the most affordable homes ($407k median).
Gilford has the most kids (20.6% under 18).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureMeredithOgunquitRandolphGilford
People
Population
6,758
1,379
420Lowest
7,830Highest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+6.7%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
+76.8%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
—
+8%
U.S.: +7.4%
Median age
55.5±3.7
43% above U.S.
62.8±4.8Highest
61% above U.S.
57.5±10.9
48% above U.S.
48.2±3.9Lowest
24% above U.S.
Ogunquit and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
12.6%±3.3
U.S.: 22%
5.7%±3.2Lowest
U.S.: 22%
14.5%±6.5
U.S.: 22%
20.6%±4.5Highest
U.S.: 22%
Gilford and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
34.2%±5
U.S.: 17.2%
43.6%±10.1Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
31.7%±2.8
U.S.: 17.2%
21.8%±3.2Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
Ogunquit and Meredith are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
45.9%
U.S.: 35.7%
63.5%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
60.1%
U.S.: 35.7%
45.4%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
2.9%±1.2
U.S.: 6.4%
4.2%±2.8
U.S.: 6.4%
5.5%±3.7Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
2.3%±1.2Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
Randolph and Ogunquit are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$87,019±$19kLowest
8% above U.S.
$114,259±$56k
42% above U.S.
$101,750±$16k
26% above U.S.
$116,635±$11kHighest
44% above U.S.
Gilford and Ogunquit are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$480,100±$48k
44% above U.S.
$875,700±$79kHighest
163% above U.S.
$407,000±$57kLowest
22% above U.S.
$456,500±$56k
37% above U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,149±$304Lowest
19% below U.S.
—
$1,667±$215Highest
18% above U.S.
$1,150±$747
19% below U.S.
Randolph and Gilford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$5,006Highest
61% above U.S.
$4,473
43% above U.S.
$4,269Lowest
37% above U.S.
$4,868
56% above U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
48.5%±9.2
U.S.: 51.1%
0%±61.1Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
50%±53.1
U.S.: 51.1%
62.2%±8.5Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
Gilford and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
7.7%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
3.2%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
6.7%
U.S.: 12.5%
6.2%
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
75.8%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
94.3%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
83.3%
U.S.: 65.2%
93.1%
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1975
5 yrs older than U.S.
1978
2 yrs older than U.S.
1963Lowest
17 yrs older than U.S.
1983Highest
3 yrs newer than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
26 min
about the U.S. average
26 min
about the U.S. average
27 minHighest
about the U.S. average
22 minLowest
17% below U.S.
Work from home
23.7%±4.9
U.S.: 15.1%
43.3%±12.4Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
19.5%±5.3
U.S.: 15.1%
16.9%±4.8Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #62 of 120 in NH — — #45 of 120 in NH
School district Inter-Lakes Cooperative School District — — Gilford School District
High school in town Inter-Lakes High School — — Gilford High School
Students per teacherat that high school
11.1Lowest
— —
11.5Highest
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.