Compare towns
Marshfield vs Proctor vs Vershire
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Marshfield has the most people working from home (17.5%).
Proctor has the shortest commute (22 min average).
Vershire has the oldest population (median age 45.7).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Marshfield | Proctor | Vershire |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 470Lowest |
1,794Highest |
842 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | +1.3%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-7.9%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 42.4±8.8Lowest about the VT average |
42.4±6.4Lowest about the VT average |
45.7±9.3Highest 6% above VT |
| Vershire and Marshfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.4%±9.1 VT: 17.9% |
21.8%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.1%±4.5Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Proctor and Marshfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 10.2%±4.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
22.4%±2.5Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.2%±5 VT: 21.4% |
| Proctor and Vershire are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 35.7%Highest VT: 43.8% |
28.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
31.8% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.6%±2.4Lowest VT: 7% |
3.6%±1.7Lowest VT: 7% |
5.2%±2.6Highest VT: 7% |
| Vershire and Marshfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $84,375±$20kHighest 4% above VT |
$74,167±$12k 9% below VT |
$71,618±$12kLowest 12% below VT |
| Marshfield and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $178,300±$31kLowest 44% below VT |
$209,900±$17kHighest 34% below VT |
$209,100±$55k 34% below VT |
| Proctor and Vershire are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,125±$79Highest 9% below VT |
$1,029±$202Lowest 17% below VT |
$1,117±$80 9% below VT |
| Marshfield and Vershire are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,269Lowest 35% below VT |
$4,032 20% below VT |
$4,640Highest 8% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 52.4%±62.4 VT: 48.4% |
37.3%±16.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
77.8%±24.5Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Vershire and Marshfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
16.2% VT: 10.1% |
19.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 81.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
86.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
81.5% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1985Highest 9 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 29 min 24% above VT |
22 minLowest 6% below VT |
32 minHighest 38% above VT |
| Work from home | 17.5%±7.2Highest VT: 16.9% |
9.4%±4.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.3%±4.1 VT: 16.9% |
| Marshfield and Vershire are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | — | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 | — |
| High school in town | — | Proctor Junior/Senior High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 8.7 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.