Compare towns

Mapleton vs Newfields vs Epping vs Newburgh

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Mapleton has the most affordable homes ($192k median).
Newfields has the highest household income ($198k).
Epping has grown the fastest since 2010 (+11.1%).
Newburgh has the oldest population (median age 45.8).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureMapletonNewfieldsEppingNewburgh
People
Population
1,884
2,023
7,430Highest
1,475Lowest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
-3.2%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
+5.3%
U.S.: +7.4%
+11.1%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
+2.8%
U.S.: +7.4%
Median age
41.8±6Lowest
7% above U.S.
44.1±1.8
13% above U.S.
45.1±3.5
16% above U.S.
45.8±5.7Highest
18% above U.S.
Newburgh and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
22.2%±5.1Highest
U.S.: 22%
18.9%±1.6
U.S.: 22%
18.7%±4.8Lowest
U.S.: 22%
18.8%±3.6
U.S.: 22%
Mapleton and Newfields are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
18.3%±3.1
U.S.: 17.2%
13.6%±0.9Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
22.6%±5.2Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
21.4%±2.4
U.S.: 17.2%
Epping and Newburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
34.3%
U.S.: 35.7%
68.1%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
37%
U.S.: 35.7%
29.9%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
5%±2.9
U.S.: 6.4%
7.5%±7.2Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
5.1%±3.3
U.S.: 6.4%
4.3%±2.7Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
Newfields and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$91,731±$25k
14% above U.S.
$197,885±$15kHighest
145% above U.S.
$104,220±$7k
29% above U.S.
$76,750±$10kLowest
5% below U.S.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$191,800±$23kLowest
42% below U.S.
$646,400±$34kHighest
94% above U.S.
$436,900±$35k
31% above U.S.
$244,600±$20k
26% below U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$610±$277Lowest
57% below U.S.
$1,875±$323Highest
33% above U.S.
$1,742±$576
23% above U.S.
$950±$219
33% below U.S.
Newfields and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$1,789Lowest
43% below U.S.
$10,000+Highest
at least 221% above U.S.
$6,936
122% above U.S.
$2,748
12% below U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
16.7%±10.5Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
43.3%±40.8
U.S.: 51.1%
67.8%±25.9Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
42.9%±13.9
U.S.: 51.1%
Epping and Newfields are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
8.9%
U.S.: 12.5%
2.4%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
4.7%
U.S.: 12.5%
11.7%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
79.9%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
95.3%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
86.3%
U.S.: 65.2%
81.2%
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1977Lowest
3 yrs older than U.S.
1991Highest
11 yrs newer than U.S.
1989
9 yrs newer than U.S.
1985
5 yrs newer than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
28 min
5% above U.S.
26 minLowest
about the U.S. average
32 minHighest
22% above U.S.
30 min
14% above U.S.
Work from home
10.8%±3.8
U.S.: 15.1%
25.5%±3.7Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
24%±6.9
U.S.: 15.1%
6.4%±3.3Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
Newfields and Epping are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — — #77 of 120 in NH —
School district RSU 79/MSAD 01 Newfields School District Epping School District —
High school in town None in town None in town Epping High School —
Students per teacherat that high school — —
9.3
—
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.