Compare towns

Mapleton vs Hooksett vs Washburn vs Newburgh

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Mapleton has the most kids (22.2% under 18).
Hooksett has grown the fastest since 2010 (+10.6%).
Washburn has the most affordable homes ($113k median).
Newburgh has the most homeowners (81.2%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureMapletonHooksettWashburnNewburgh
People
Population
1,884
15,057Highest
1,355Lowest
1,475
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
-3.2%
U.S.: +7.4%
+10.6%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
-9.5%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
+2.8%
U.S.: +7.4%
Median age
41.8±6
7% above U.S.
41.3±1.5Lowest
6% above U.S.
48.2±7.7Highest
24% above U.S.
45.8±5.7
18% above U.S.
Washburn and Newburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
22.2%±5.1Highest
U.S.: 22%
17.4%±2.9Lowest
U.S.: 22%
21.7%±3.5
U.S.: 22%
18.8%±3.6
U.S.: 22%
Mapleton and Washburn are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
18.3%±3.1
U.S.: 17.2%
17.3%±2.4Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
24%±3.7Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
21.4%±2.4
U.S.: 17.2%
Washburn and Newburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
34.3%
U.S.: 35.7%
39.6%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
26%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
29.9%
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
5%±2.9
U.S.: 6.4%
8.9%±1.6Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
3.6%±1.4Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
4.3%±2.7
U.S.: 6.4%
Hooksett and Mapleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$91,731±$25k
14% above U.S.
$117,962±$11kHighest
46% above U.S.
$56,196±$6kLowest
30% below U.S.
$76,750±$10k
5% below U.S.
Hooksett and Mapleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$191,800±$23k
42% below U.S.
$407,000±$26kHighest
22% above U.S.
$112,900±$14kLowest
66% below U.S.
$244,600±$20k
26% below U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$610±$277
57% below U.S.
$1,661±$206Highest
18% above U.S.
$482±$62Lowest
66% below U.S.
$950±$219
33% below U.S.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$1,789
43% below U.S.
$6,554Highest
110% above U.S.
$1,571Lowest
50% below U.S.
$2,748
12% below U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
16.7%±10.5Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
41.7%±16.4
U.S.: 51.1%
33.3%±24.7
U.S.: 51.1%
42.9%±13.9Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
Newburgh and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
8.9%
U.S.: 12.5%
3.3%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
12.7%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
11.7%
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
79.9%
U.S.: 65.2%
80.6%
U.S.: 65.2%
78.2%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
81.2%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1977
3 yrs older than U.S.
1988Highest
8 yrs newer than U.S.
1969Lowest
11 yrs older than U.S.
1985
5 yrs newer than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
28 min
5% above U.S.
27 min
about the U.S. average
21 minLowest
21% below U.S.
30 minHighest
14% above U.S.
Work from home
10.8%±3.8
U.S.: 15.1%
13.4%±3.1Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
9.7%±3.9
U.S.: 15.1%
6.4%±3.3Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
Hooksett and Mapleton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — #30 of 120 in NH — —
School district RSU 79/MSAD 01 Hooksett School District RSU 45/MSAD 45 —
High school in town None in town None in town Washburn District High School —
Students per teacherat that high school — —
12.0
—
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.