Compare towns
Manchester vs Salisbury vs Winhall
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Manchester has the most people working from home (23.1%).
Salisbury has the most affordable homes ($307k median).
Winhall has grown the fastest since 2010 (+53.7%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Manchester | Salisbury | Winhall |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,486Highest |
1,200 |
752Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +2.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+7.5% VT: +2.8% |
+53.7%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 54.5±6.3Highest 26% above VT |
50.6±6.5 17% above VT |
48.9±6.1Lowest 13% above VT |
| Manchester and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 16.9%±4.5 VT: 17.9% |
16.6%±3.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
17%±6.8Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Winhall and Manchester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 25.7%±4.6 VT: 21.4% |
30.4%±2.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
20.6%±5.3Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Salisbury and Manchester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 47.4% VT: 43.8% |
34.6%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
67.4%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.8%±3Highest VT: 7% |
1.6%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
3.1%±4 VT: 7% |
| Manchester and Winhall are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $94,886±$23kLowest 17% above VT |
$99,688±$21kHighest 23% above VT |
$95,500±$23k 18% above VT |
| Salisbury and Winhall are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $454,600±$47k 44% above VT |
$306,900±$51kLowest 3% below VT |
$471,800±$55kHighest 49% above VT |
| Winhall and Manchester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,057±$76Lowest 14% below VT |
$1,443±$984Highest 17% above VT |
$1,094±$732 11% below VT |
| Salisbury and Winhall are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,923 18% above VT |
$4,842Lowest 4% below VT |
$6,567Highest 30% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 56.5%±13.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
31.9%±22.6Lowest VT: 48.4% |
37.5%±38.9 VT: 48.4% |
| Manchester and Winhall are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 16.8%Highest VT: 10.1% |
4.6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
5.3% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 73.8%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
88.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
80.5% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981 5 yrs newer than VT |
1967Lowest 9 yrs older than VT |
1982Highest 6 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 14 minLowest 39% below VT |
19 min 20% below VT |
27 minHighest 13% above VT |
| Work from home | 23.1%±5.2Highest VT: 16.9% |
6%±2.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
18.4%±9 VT: 16.9% |
| Manchester and Winhall are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #37 of 70 in VT | — | — |
| School district | Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Addison Central Unified Union School District #55 | — |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.