Compare towns
Lyman vs Lancaster
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lyman has the most affordable homes ($360k median).
Lancaster has the most people working from home (33.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lyman | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||
| People | ||
| Population | 4,612Lowest |
8,606Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.2%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+4.8%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 53.8±2Highest 38% above U.S. |
43.1±4.9Lowest 11% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 15.2%±4Lowest U.S.: 22% |
19.2%±4Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Lancaster and Lyman are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Age 65+ | 26.1%±6.4Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
19.9%±4.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Lyman and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 25.1%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
50.3%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.3%±1.8Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
3%±1.8Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Lyman and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Cost of living | ||
| Household incomemedian | $87,284±$14kLowest 8% above U.S. |
$134,833±$27kHighest 67% above U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $360,400±$44kLowest 8% above U.S. |
$519,100±$60kHighest 56% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,063±$522Lowest 25% below U.S. |
$2,338±$539Highest 65% above U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $2,717Lowest 13% below U.S. |
$7,235Highest 132% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 37.7%±44.7Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
68.3%±36.7Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Lancaster and Lyman are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Below poverty line | 9%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
1.4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | ||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 95%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
85.1%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1979Highest 1 yr older than U.S. |
1971Lowest 9 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | ||
| Average commuteone way | 33 minHighest 26% above U.S. |
32 minLowest 20% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 18.9%±6.9Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
33.6%±9.1Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Lancaster and Lyman are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Schools | ||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #40 of 133 in ME | #145 of 282 in MA |
| School district | RSU 57/MSAD 57 | Nashoba |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | ||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.
