Compare towns
Lunenburg vs Worcester vs Orange
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lunenburg has the most affordable homes ($164k median).
Worcester has the most people working from home (23.6%).
Orange has grown the fastest since 2010 (-2.2%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lunenburg | Worcester | Orange |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,267Highest |
831Lowest |
957 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -4.3%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-3.4% VT: +2.8% |
-2.2%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 51.2±4.2Highest 19% above VT |
47±2.7Lowest 9% above VT |
50.3±5.3 17% above VT |
| Lunenburg and Orange are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.1%±3 VT: 17.9% |
12.8%±3.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
15.6%±4.7Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Orange and Lunenburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 24.1%±3.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
19.5%±2.5 VT: 21.4% |
19.4%±4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Lunenburg and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 14.6%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
53%Highest VT: 43.8% |
22.1% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.6%±1.4 VT: 7% |
6.9%±4.7Highest VT: 7% |
2.4%±1.9Lowest VT: 7% |
| Worcester and Lunenburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $53,125±$9kLowest 35% below VT |
$73,833±$18kHighest 9% below VT |
$71,302±$13k 12% below VT |
| Worcester and Orange are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $164,000±$11kLowest 48% below VT |
$271,100±$27kHighest 14% below VT |
$222,000±$22k 30% below VT |
| Worcester and Orange are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,025±$172 17% below VT |
$1,023±$136Lowest 17% below VT |
$1,330±$153Highest 8% above VT |
| Orange and Lunenburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $2,702Lowest 46% below VT |
$4,421Highest 12% below VT |
$3,545 30% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 52.5%±57.6Highest VT: 48.4% |
25.5%±37 VT: 48.4% |
0%±87Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Lunenburg and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 10.6%Highest VT: 10.1% |
5.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
7.6% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 82.6%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
85.9% VT: 73.2% |
87.8%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1972Lowest 4 yrs older than VT |
1976 same as VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 minHighest 28% above VT |
29 min 22% above VT |
28 minLowest 19% above VT |
| Work from home | 4.9%±2.9Lowest VT: 16.9% |
23.6%±4.8Highest VT: 16.9% |
13.5%±4.3 VT: 16.9% |
| Schools | |||
| School district | Kingdom East Unified Union School District #64 | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 | Echo Valley Community Union School District #67 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.


