Compare towns
Lunenburg vs Randolph vs Coventry
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lunenburg has the most affordable homes ($164k median).
Randolph has the most people working from home (12.9%).
Coventry has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.3%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lunenburg | Randolph | Coventry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,267 |
4,843Highest |
917Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -4.3%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1% VT: +2.8% |
+1.3%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 51.2±4.2Highest 19% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
45.2±5.2 5% above VT |
| Lunenburg and Coventry are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.1%±3Lowest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
20.2%±4.1Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Coventry and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 24.1%±3.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
22.5%±3.3Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Lunenburg and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 14.6%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
40.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
21.7% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.6%±1.4Lowest VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
3.7%±3.5 VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $53,125±$9kLowest 35% below VT |
$76,758±$6kHighest 5% below VT |
$59,342±$3k 27% below VT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $164,000±$11kLowest 48% below VT |
$278,700±$38kHighest 12% below VT |
$197,900±$55k 37% below VT |
| Randolph and Coventry are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,025±$172 17% below VT |
$1,172±$173Highest 5% below VT |
$755±$108Lowest 39% below VT |
| Randolph and Lunenburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $2,702 46% below VT |
$4,698Highest 7% below VT |
$2,375Lowest 53% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 52.5%±57.6 VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
1.5%±27.7Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Lunenburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 10.6% VT: 10.1% |
7.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
19.6%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 82.6% VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
82.8%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1972 4 yrs older than VT |
1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
1993Highest 17 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 min 28% above VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
36 minHighest 53% above VT |
| Work from home | 4.9%±2.9Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7Highest VT: 16.9% |
8.6%±3.7 VT: 16.9% |
| Randolph and Coventry are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #55 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Kingdom East Unified Union School District #64 | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | Coventry School District |
| High school in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.