Compare towns
Lunenburg vs Nottingham vs Orange
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lunenburg has the most affordable homes ($164k median).
Nottingham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+9.3%).
Orange has the shortest commute (28 min average).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lunenburg | Nottingham | Orange |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,267 |
5,357Highest |
957Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -4.3%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+9.3%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-2.2% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 51.2±4.2Highest 32% above U.S. |
38.8±6.7Lowest about the U.S. average |
50.3±5.3 29% above U.S. |
| Lunenburg and Orange are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.1%±3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
23.9%±5.4Highest U.S.: 22% |
15.6%±4.7 U.S.: 22% |
| Nottingham and Orange are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 24.1%±3.6Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
18.4%±4.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
19.4%±4 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Lunenburg and Orange are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 14.6%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
40.9%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
22.1% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.6%±1.4 U.S.: 6.4% |
5.9%±2.6Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.4%±1.9Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Nottingham and Lunenburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $53,125±$9kLowest 34% below U.S. |
$122,201±$20kHighest 51% above U.S. |
$71,302±$13k 12% below U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $164,000±$11kLowest 51% below U.S. |
$457,500±$26kHighest 38% above U.S. |
$222,000±$22k 33% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,025±$172Lowest 27% below U.S. |
$2,068±$1kHighest 46% above U.S. |
$1,330±$153 6% below U.S. |
| Nottingham and Orange are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $2,702Lowest 13% below U.S. |
$7,319Highest 135% above U.S. |
$3,545 14% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 52.5%±57.6 U.S.: 51.1% |
92.1%±44.9Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
0%±87Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Nottingham and Lunenburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 10.6%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
1.4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
7.6% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 82.6%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
94.3%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
87.8% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1972Lowest 8 yrs older than U.S. |
1992Highest 12 yrs newer than U.S. |
1981 1 yr newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 30 min 14% above U.S. |
34 minHighest 28% above U.S. |
28 minLowest 6% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 4.9%±2.9Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
22.2%±5.8Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
13.5%±4.3 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Nottingham and Orange are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #15 of 120 in NH | — |
| School district | Kingdom East Unified Union School District #64 | Nottingham School District | Echo Valley Community Union School District #67 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.