Compare towns
Ludlow vs Randolph vs Wilder
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Ludlow has the most people working from home (17.3%).
Randolph has the most kids (17.3% under 18).
Wilder has grown the fastest since 2010 (+81.7%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Ludlow | Randolph | Wilder |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 808Lowest |
4,843Highest |
3,087 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -4.7%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1% VT: +2.8% |
+81.7%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 48.7±5.6Highest 13% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
45.5±8.9 6% above VT |
| Ludlow and Wilder are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 13.1%±3.7 VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
11.8%±4.1Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Randolph and Ludlow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 30.4%±0.5Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
27.3%±4.4 VT: 21.4% |
| Ludlow and Wilder are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 39.3%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
40.8% VT: 43.8% |
60.2%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.6%±1.6Lowest VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
8.1%±3.9 VT: 7% |
| Randolph and Wilder are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $56,667±$19kLowest 30% below VT |
$76,758±$6kHighest 5% below VT |
$75,143±$9k 7% below VT |
| Randolph and Wilder are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $304,000±$32kHighest 4% below VT |
$278,700±$38k 12% below VT |
$273,200±$18kLowest 14% below VT |
| Ludlow and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,018±$91Lowest 18% below VT |
$1,172±$173Highest 5% below VT |
$1,142±$451 7% below VT |
| Randolph and Wilder are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,237Lowest 16% below VT |
$4,698 7% below VT |
$5,505Highest 9% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 33%±13.8Lowest VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
39.9%±17.2 VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Wilder are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.7% VT: 10.1% |
7.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
9.3%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 51.4%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
62.9% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1971 5 yrs older than VT |
1983Highest 7 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 21 minHighest 10% below VT |
21 min 12% below VT |
17 minLowest 29% below VT |
| Work from home | 17.3%±6.4Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
12.6%±6.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Ludlow and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #55 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | — | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | — |
| High school in town | — | Randolph Union High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.