Compare towns
Lowell vs Pittsford vs Kirby
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lowell has the youngest population (median age 32.9).
Pittsford has the shortest commute (25 min average).
Kirby has the most people working from home (20.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lowell | Pittsford | Kirby |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,070 |
2,892Highest |
756Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +0.9%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-4.3%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
— |
| Median age | 32.9±6.5Lowest 24% below VT |
47.7±6.3Highest 11% above VT |
38.8±7.1 10% below VT |
| Pittsford and Kirby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 30.7%±6.2Highest VT: 17.9% |
15.1%±5.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
30%±5.4 VT: 17.9% |
| Lowell and Kirby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 12.3%±4.1Lowest VT: 21.4% |
25.4%±6.1Highest VT: 21.4% |
19.2%±5.1 VT: 21.4% |
| Pittsford and Kirby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 19.2%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
37%Highest VT: 43.8% |
32.4% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.8%±1.9Lowest VT: 7% |
3%±2.1 VT: 7% |
4.6%±3.1Highest VT: 7% |
| Kirby and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $57,404±$15k 29% below VT |
$69,705±$7kHighest 14% below VT |
$54,792±$21kLowest 33% below VT |
| Pittsford and Lowell are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $183,400±$33kLowest 42% below VT |
$197,000±$33k 38% below VT |
$302,900±$63kHighest 4% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $945±$46 23% below VT |
$781±$167Lowest 37% below VT |
$1,250±$326Highest about the VT average |
| Kirby and Lowell are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $2,810Lowest 44% below VT |
$3,378 33% below VT |
$4,597Highest 9% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 26.3%±92.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
18.5%±12.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
25%±100 VT: 48.4% |
| Lowell and Kirby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
11.3% VT: 10.1% |
21.3%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 94.1%Highest VT: 73.2% |
80.6%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
93.5% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1984 8 yrs newer than VT |
1972Lowest 4 yrs older than VT |
1985Highest 9 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 55 minHighest 135% above VT |
25 minLowest 7% above VT |
34 min 43% above VT |
| Work from home | 7.5%±2.3Lowest VT: 16.9% |
10.1%±6.9 VT: 16.9% |
20.6%±9.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Kirby and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #54 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Lowell School District | Otter Valley Unified Union School District #53 | — |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.