Compare towns
Lowell vs Enosburgh vs Irasburg
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lowell has the most kids (30.7% under 18).
Enosburgh has the most people working from home (10.1%).
Irasburg has the highest household income ($99k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lowell | Enosburgh | Irasburg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,070Lowest |
2,804Highest |
1,384 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +0.9%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
— | +6%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 32.9±6.5Lowest 24% below VT |
40.6±3.9Highest 6% below VT |
40.3±5.3 6% below VT |
| Enosburgh and Irasburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 30.7%±6.2Highest VT: 17.9% |
21%±4.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
24.4%±3 VT: 17.9% |
| Lowell and Irasburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 12.3%±4.1Lowest VT: 21.4% |
17.9%±3.3 VT: 21.4% |
19.5%±2Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Irasburg and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 19.2%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
20.1% VT: 43.8% |
23.6%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.8%±1.9Lowest VT: 7% |
5.4%±2.4Highest VT: 7% |
3%±2.5 VT: 7% |
| Enosburgh and Irasburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $57,404±$15kLowest 29% below VT |
$63,828±$17k 21% below VT |
$98,534±$13kHighest 21% above VT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $183,400±$33kLowest 42% below VT |
$223,100±$39k 30% below VT |
$230,800±$22kHighest 27% below VT |
| Irasburg and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $945±$46 23% below VT |
$852±$87Lowest 31% below VT |
$1,063±$86Highest 14% below VT |
| Irasburg and Lowell are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $2,810Lowest 44% below VT |
$3,624 28% below VT |
$3,966Highest 21% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 26.3%±92.9 VT: 48.4% |
48.9%±11.2Highest VT: 48.4% |
17%±28.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Enosburgh and Lowell are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.6% VT: 10.1% |
13.9%Highest VT: 10.1% |
2.5%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 94.1%Highest VT: 73.2% |
75.7%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
86.1% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1984 8 yrs newer than VT |
1972Lowest 4 yrs older than VT |
1988Highest 12 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 55 minHighest 135% above VT |
32 min 36% above VT |
24 minLowest 3% above VT |
| Work from home | 7.5%±2.3 VT: 16.9% |
10.1%±4.4Highest VT: 16.9% |
5.7%±2.1Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Enosburgh and Lowell are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #26 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Lowell School District | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 | Lake Region Union Elementary Middle School District |
| High school in town | None in town | Enosburg Falls Middle/High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 10.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.