Compare towns
Lisbon vs Landaff vs Lancaster
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lisbon has the most affordable homes ($198k median).
Landaff has the most expensive homes ($279k median).
Lancaster has the most people working from home (11.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lisbon | Landaff | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,583 |
420Lowest |
3,216Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +1.6%Highest NH: +4.6% |
— | -8.2%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 46.4±5.7 7% above NH |
56.4±5.2Highest 30% above NH |
45.5±6.9Lowest 5% above NH |
| Landaff and Lisbon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.5%±6.2Highest NH: 18.2% |
16.2%±5.9Lowest NH: 18.2% |
20.9%±6.1 NH: 18.2% |
| Lisbon and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.8%±5Lowest NH: 20.1% |
28.8%±4.7Highest NH: 20.1% |
28.4%±5.8 NH: 20.1% |
| Landaff and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 30.1%Highest NH: 40.6% |
26.3%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
30.1%Highest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.3%±2.2 NH: 6% |
1.7%±1.6Lowest NH: 6% |
2.9%±2.2Highest NH: 6% |
| Lancaster and Lisbon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $65,500±$13kLowest 34% below NH |
$87,500±$26kHighest 12% below NH |
$68,911±$23k 30% below NH |
| Landaff and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $198,000±$19kLowest 51% below NH |
$279,300±$20kHighest 31% below NH |
$215,700±$24k 46% below NH |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,344±$303 10% below NH |
$1,375±$707Highest 8% below NH |
$1,019±$263Lowest 32% below NH |
| Landaff and Lisbon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,691 30% below NH |
$4,813Highest 28% below NH |
$4,226Lowest 37% below NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 52.9%±18.9Highest NH: 48.2% |
45.5%±100 NH: 48.2% |
36.1%±17Lowest NH: 48.2% |
| Lisbon and Landaff are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.6% NH: 7.2% |
5.7%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
16.7%Highest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 74.2%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
90.3%Highest NH: 72.8% |
75.1% NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1969 10 yrs older than NH |
1984Highest 5 yrs newer than NH |
1942Lowest 37 yrs older than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 22 minLowest 19% below NH |
32 minHighest 21% above NH |
23 min 14% below NH |
| Work from home | 10.3%±2.9 NH: 16.8% |
10.2%±5.7Lowest NH: 16.8% |
11.5%±6.3Highest NH: 16.8% |
| Lancaster and Lisbon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #107 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Lisbon Regional School District | Landaff School District | White Mountains Regional School District |
| High school in town | Lisbon Regional School (High) | None in town | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 6.4 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.