Compare towns
Lisbon vs Deering vs Lancaster
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lisbon has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.6%).
Deering has the highest household income ($101k).
Lancaster has the most people working from home (11.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lisbon | Deering | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,583Lowest |
1,938 |
3,216Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +1.6%Highest NH: +4.6% |
-0.4% NH: +4.6% |
-8.2%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 46.4±5.7 7% above NH |
48.8±5.7Highest 13% above NH |
45.5±6.9Lowest 5% above NH |
| Deering and Lisbon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.5%±6.2Highest NH: 18.2% |
17.3%±4.3Lowest NH: 18.2% |
20.9%±6.1 NH: 18.2% |
| Lisbon and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.8%±5Lowest NH: 20.1% |
23.9%±1.2 NH: 20.1% |
28.4%±5.8Highest NH: 20.1% |
| Lancaster and Deering are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 30.1%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
31%Highest NH: 40.6% |
30.1%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.3%±2.2 NH: 6% |
1.6%±1.1Lowest NH: 6% |
2.9%±2.2Highest NH: 6% |
| Lancaster and Lisbon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $65,500±$13kLowest 34% below NH |
$101,250±$16kHighest about the NH average |
$68,911±$23k 30% below NH |
| Deering and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $198,000±$19kLowest 51% below NH |
$309,900±$27kHighest 23% below NH |
$215,700±$24k 46% below NH |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,344±$303Highest 10% below NH |
$1,306±$116 12% below NH |
$1,019±$263Lowest 32% below NH |
| Lisbon and Deering are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,691 30% below NH |
$6,223Highest 7% below NH |
$4,226Lowest 37% below NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 52.9%±18.9Highest NH: 48.2% |
23.9%±27.6Lowest NH: 48.2% |
36.1%±17 NH: 48.2% |
| Lisbon and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.6%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
14.3% NH: 7.2% |
16.7%Highest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 74.2%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
87.7%Highest NH: 72.8% |
75.1% NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1969 10 yrs older than NH |
1977Highest 2 yrs older than NH |
1942Lowest 37 yrs older than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 22 minLowest 19% below NH |
40 minHighest 49% above NH |
23 min 14% below NH |
| Work from home | 10.3%±2.9 NH: 16.8% |
10%±2.7Lowest NH: 16.8% |
11.5%±6.3Highest NH: 16.8% |
| Lancaster and Lisbon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #107 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Lisbon Regional School District | — | White Mountains Regional School District |
| High school in town | Lisbon Regional School (High) | — | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 6.4 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.