Compare towns
Lisbon vs Lancaster
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lisbon has grown the fastest since 2010 (+7.8%).
Lancaster has the most expensive homes ($519k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lisbon | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||
| People | ||
| Population | 9,750Highest |
8,606Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +7.8%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+4.8%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 38.4±2.9Lowest about the U.S. average |
43.1±4.9Highest 11% above U.S. |
| Lancaster and Lisbon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Kids under 18 | 22.2%±4Highest U.S.: 22% |
19.2%±4Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Lisbon and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Age 65+ | 16.2%±3.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
19.9%±4.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Lancaster and Lisbon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 23.4%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
50.3%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.3%±1.8Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
3%±1.8Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Lisbon and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Cost of living | ||
| Household incomemedian | $77,819±$9kLowest 4% below U.S. |
$134,833±$27kHighest 67% above U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $258,300±$26kLowest 22% below U.S. |
$519,100±$60kHighest 56% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $979±$286Lowest 31% below U.S. |
$2,338±$539Highest 65% above U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,324Lowest 7% above U.S. |
$7,235Highest 132% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 43.4%±14.2Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
68.3%±36.7Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Lancaster and Lisbon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Below poverty line | 5.3%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
1.4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | ||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 74.8%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
85.1%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1973Highest 7 yrs older than U.S. |
1971Lowest 9 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | ||
| Average commuteone way | 29 minLowest 9% above U.S. |
32 minHighest 20% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 18.1%±9.6Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
33.6%±9.1Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Lancaster and Lisbon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Schools | ||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #60 of 133 in ME | #145 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Lisbon Public Schools | Nashoba |
| High school in town | Lisbon High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 15.8 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | ||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.
