Compare towns
Leominster vs Lunenburg vs Lancaster
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Leominster has the most renters (37.7% rent).
Lunenburg has grown the fastest since 2010 (+16.8%).
Lancaster has the most people working from home (33.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Leominster | Lunenburg | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 43,909Highest |
11,902 |
8,606Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +7.4% MA: +7.4% |
+16.8%Highest MA: +7.4% |
+4.8%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
| Median age | 43.3±2.2Highest 8% above MA |
43.2±2.1 8% above MA |
43.1±4.9Lowest 8% above MA |
| Leominster and Lunenburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19%±1.8Lowest MA: 19.4% |
21.1%±3Highest MA: 19.4% |
19.2%±4 MA: 19.4% |
| Lunenburg and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.3%±1.9 MA: 17.9% |
17.9%±2.7Lowest MA: 17.9% |
19.9%±4.2Highest MA: 17.9% |
| Lancaster and Leominster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 33.5%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
44% MA: 47.3% |
50.3%Highest MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.9%±1Highest MA: 7.9% |
4.2%±1.8 MA: 7.9% |
3%±1.8Lowest MA: 7.9% |
| Leominster and Lunenburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $83,816±$7kLowest 19% below MA |
$112,828±$11k 9% above MA |
$134,833±$27kHighest 30% above MA |
| Lancaster and Lunenburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $380,400±$14kLowest 32% below MA |
$463,900±$24k 17% below MA |
$519,100±$60kHighest 8% below MA |
| Lancaster and Lunenburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,354±$50Lowest 23% below MA |
$1,974±$586 12% above MA |
$2,338±$539Highest 33% above MA |
| Lancaster and Lunenburg are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,256Lowest 12% below MA |
$6,401 7% above MA |
$7,235Highest 21% above MA |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 48.9%±5.6 MA: 51.8% |
45.8%±13.5Lowest MA: 51.8% |
68.3%±36.7Highest MA: 51.8% |
| Lancaster and Leominster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 9.2%Highest MA: 10% |
4.2% MA: 10% |
1.4%Lowest MA: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 62.3%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
80.7% MA: 62.5% |
85.1%Highest MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1967Lowest 3 yrs newer than MA |
1972Highest 8 yrs newer than MA |
1971 7 yrs newer than MA |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 26 minLowest 10% below MA |
36 minHighest 24% above MA |
32 min 9% above MA |
| Work from home | 10.9%±2.1Lowest MA: 18.6% |
15.8%±3.5 MA: 18.6% |
33.6%±9.1Highest MA: 18.6% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #233 of 282 in MA | #87 of 282 in MA | #145 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Leominster | Lunenburg | Nashoba |
| High school in town | Leominster High School | Lunenburg High | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 10.6Lowest |
12.4Highest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.