Compare towns
Leicester vs Holland vs Whitingham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Leicester has the most people working from home (12.7%).
Holland has grown the fastest since 2010 (+0.5%).
Whitingham has the oldest housing (typical home built 1974).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Leicester | Holland | Whitingham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,026 |
790Lowest |
1,368Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -10%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+0.5%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-1% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 48.8±3.8Highest 13% above VT |
41.8±3.9Lowest 3% below VT |
46.4±7.1 8% above VT |
| Leicester and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.9%±5.1Lowest VT: 17.9% |
23.9%±3.9Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.8%±4.5 VT: 17.9% |
| Holland and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 24.5%±6.7 VT: 21.4% |
20.1%±3.8Lowest VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Whitingham and Leicester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 35.9%Highest VT: 43.8% |
25.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
32.8% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.3%±1.6Lowest VT: 7% |
6.8%±4.4Highest VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.9 VT: 7% |
| Holland and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $70,417±$30k 13% below VT |
$60,729±$16kLowest 25% below VT |
$70,625±$11kHighest 13% below VT |
| Whitingham and Leicester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $309,700±$107kHighest about the VT average |
$209,400±$44kLowest 34% below VT |
$262,300±$30k 17% below VT |
| Leicester and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,098±$300 11% below VT |
$1,330±$69Highest 8% above VT |
$673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
| Holland and Leicester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,822 24% below VT |
$3,463Lowest 31% below VT |
$5,055Highest about the VT average |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 33.3%±40.4Lowest VT: 48.4% |
73.5%±100Highest VT: 48.4% |
62.7%±47.3 VT: 48.4% |
| Holland and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 11.8%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
13.9% VT: 10.1% |
15.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 85.5%Highest VT: 73.2% |
72%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
85.2% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1974Lowest 2 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 min 20% above VT |
26 minLowest 9% above VT |
38 minHighest 62% above VT |
| Work from home | 12.7%±5.9Highest VT: 16.9% |
6.3%±6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
9.7%±5.2 VT: 16.9% |
| Leicester and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | — | — | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 |
| High school in town | — | — | Twin Valley Middle High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 7.8 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.