Compare towns
Lancaster vs Woolwich
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lancaster has grown the fastest since 2010 (+4.8%).
Woolwich has the most affordable homes ($255k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lancaster | Woolwich |
|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||
| People | ||
| Population | 8,606Highest |
3,158Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.8%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-0.1%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 43.1±4.9Lowest 11% above U.S. |
55.8±5.5Highest 43% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 19.2%±4Highest U.S.: 22% |
15%±5.5Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Lancaster and Woolwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Age 65+ | 19.9%±4.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
33.9%±8.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 50.3%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
52.9%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3%±1.8Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.4%±2.1Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Lancaster and Woolwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Cost of living | ||
| Household incomemedian | $134,833±$27kHighest 67% above U.S. |
$102,175±$26kLowest 27% above U.S. |
| Lancaster and Woolwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $519,100±$60kHighest 56% above U.S. |
$254,500±$59kLowest 24% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $2,338±$539 65% above U.S. |
— |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,235Highest 132% above U.S. |
$2,433Lowest 22% below U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 68.3%±36.7Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
64.3%±100Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Lancaster and Woolwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Below poverty line | 1.4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
13.3%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | ||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 85.1%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
95.5%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971Lowest 9 yrs older than U.S. |
1982Highest 2 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | ||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minHighest 20% above U.S. |
29 minLowest 11% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 33.6%±9.1Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
11.9%±6.2Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Schools | ||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #145 of 282 in MA | #92 of 133 in ME |
| School district | Nashoba | RSU 01 - LKRSU |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | ||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.
