Compare towns
Lancaster vs Sturbridge vs Sturbridge
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lancaster has the most people working from home (33.6%).
Sturbridge has the most renters (16.7% rent).
Sturbridge has grown the fastest since 2010 (+6.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lancaster | Sturbridge | Sturbridge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 8,606 |
2,443Lowest |
9,960Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.8%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
+5.9% MA: +7.4% |
+6.5%Highest MA: +7.4% |
| Median age | 43.1±4.9Lowest 8% above MA |
47.8±6.8Highest 20% above MA |
47.2±2.6 18% above MA |
| Sturbridge and Sturbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.2%±4 MA: 19.4% |
18.7%±4.9Lowest MA: 19.4% |
20.7%±3Highest MA: 19.4% |
| Sturbridge and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.9%±4.2Highest MA: 17.9% |
19.1%±7.8Lowest MA: 17.9% |
19.8%±3 MA: 17.9% |
| Lancaster and Sturbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 50.3% MA: 47.3% |
55.8%Highest MA: 47.3% |
49.3%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3%±1.8Lowest MA: 7.9% |
5.9%±3.8Highest MA: 7.9% |
4.6%±1.5 MA: 7.9% |
| Sturbridge and Sturbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $134,833±$27k 30% above MA |
$131,568±$34kLowest 27% above MA |
$136,759±$15kHighest 32% above MA |
| Sturbridge and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $519,100±$60kHighest 8% below MA |
$418,400±$29kLowest 26% below MA |
$425,800±$18k 24% below MA |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $2,338±$539Highest 33% above MA |
$2,009±$225 14% above MA |
$1,193±$398Lowest 32% below MA |
| Lancaster and Sturbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,235Highest 21% above MA |
$6,410Lowest 7% above MA |
$6,520 9% above MA |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 68.3%±36.7Highest MA: 51.8% |
29.1%±19.9Lowest MA: 51.8% |
42%±17.7 MA: 51.8% |
| Lancaster and Sturbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 1.4%Lowest MA: 10% |
3.2% MA: 10% |
3.7%Highest MA: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 85.1% MA: 62.5% |
83.3%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
86.3%Highest MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971 7 yrs newer than MA |
1958Lowest 6 yrs older than MA |
1982Highest 18 yrs newer than MA |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minLowest 9% above MA |
32 minLowest 9% above MA |
38 minHighest 30% above MA |
| Work from home | 33.6%±9.1Highest MA: 18.6% |
14%±9.4Lowest MA: 18.6% |
19.8%±4.8 MA: 18.6% |
| Lancaster and Sturbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #145 of 282 in MA | #89 of 282 in MA | #89 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Nashoba | — | Sturbridge · Tantasqua |
| High school in town | None in town | — | Tantasqua Regional Sr High |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 7.7 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.