Compare towns
Lancaster vs Oakham vs Windsor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lancaster has grown the fastest since 2010 (+4.8%).
Oakham has the oldest population (median age 49).
Windsor has the most affordable homes ($390k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lancaster | Oakham | Windsor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 8,606Highest |
1,639 |
1,065Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.8%Highest MA: +7.4% |
-2.7% MA: +7.4% |
-7.6%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
| Median age | 43.1±4.9Lowest 8% above MA |
49±2.3Highest 23% above MA |
44.8±6.4 12% above MA |
| Oakham and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.2%±4Highest MA: 19.4% |
18.2%±3.1 MA: 19.4% |
15.8%±5.1Lowest MA: 19.4% |
| Lancaster and Oakham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.9%±4.2 MA: 17.9% |
21.4%±2.3Highest MA: 17.9% |
18.6%±4.9Lowest MA: 17.9% |
| Oakham and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 50.3%Highest MA: 47.3% |
40.3%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
41.5% MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3%±1.8 MA: 7.9% |
3.8%±2.1Highest MA: 7.9% |
2.7%±1.7Lowest MA: 7.9% |
| Oakham and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $134,833±$27kHighest 30% above MA |
$102,000±$20kLowest about the MA average |
$115,563±$10k 11% above MA |
| Lancaster and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $519,100±$60kHighest 8% below MA |
$420,100±$20k 25% below MA |
$389,700±$32kLowest 31% below MA |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $2,338±$539Highest 33% above MA |
$1,174±$81Lowest 33% below MA |
— |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,235Highest 21% above MA |
$4,103 32% below MA |
$3,867Lowest 35% below MA |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 68.3%±36.7Highest MA: 51.8% |
27.8%±69.1 MA: 51.8% |
0%±100Lowest MA: 51.8% |
| Lancaster and Oakham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 1.4%Lowest MA: 10% |
4.4%Highest MA: 10% |
3.8% MA: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 85.1%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
91.6% MA: 62.5% |
96.2%Highest MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971 7 yrs newer than MA |
1979Highest 15 yrs newer than MA |
1970Lowest 6 yrs newer than MA |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minLowest 9% above MA |
39 minHighest 32% above MA |
37 min 27% above MA |
| Work from home | 33.6%±9.1Highest MA: 18.6% |
9.6%±3.8Lowest MA: 18.6% |
21.2%±5.8 MA: 18.6% |
| Lancaster and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #145 of 282 in MA | — | — |
| School district | Nashoba | Quabbin | — |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.