Compare towns

Lancaster vs Chilmark

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Lancaster has the most affordable homes ($519k median).
Chilmark has grown the fastest since 2010 (+40%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureLancasterChilmark
People
Population
8,606Highest
1,578Lowest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+4.8%Lowest
MA: +7.4%
+40%Highest
MA: +7.4%
Median age
43.1±4.9Lowest
8% above MA
53.6±8.1Highest
34% above MA
Chilmark and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
19.2%±4Highest
MA: 19.4%
16.7%±4.3Lowest
MA: 19.4%
Lancaster and Chilmark are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
19.9%±4.2Lowest
MA: 17.9%
36.2%±12.4Highest
MA: 17.9%
Chilmark and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
50.3%Lowest
MA: 47.3%
68.1%Highest
MA: 47.3%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
3%±1.8Highest
MA: 7.9%
2.7%±2.6Lowest
MA: 7.9%
Lancaster and Chilmark are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$134,833±$27kLowest
30% above MA
$168,750±$28kHighest
62% above MA
Chilmark and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$519,100±$60kLowest
8% below MA
$1,895,300±$281kHighest
237% above MA
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$2,338±$539Lowest
33% above MA
$2,750±$2kHighest
56% above MA
Chilmark and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$7,235Highest
21% above MA
$4,485Lowest
25% below MA
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
68.3%±36.7Highest
MA: 51.8%
30.8%±59.9Lowest
MA: 51.8%
Lancaster and Chilmark are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
1.4%Lowest
MA: 10%
4.1%Highest
MA: 10%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
85.1%Lowest
MA: 62.5%
89.4%Highest
MA: 62.5%
Typical home builtmedian year
1971Lowest
7 yrs newer than MA
1984Highest
20 yrs newer than MA
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
32 minHighest
9% above MA
32 minLowest
8% above MA
Work from home
33.6%±9.1Highest
MA: 18.6%
25.7%±11Lowest
MA: 18.6%
Lancaster and Chilmark are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #145 of 282 in MA —
School district Nashoba Up-Island Regional
High school in town None in town None in town
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet

MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.