Compare towns
Lancaster vs Cherryfield
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Lancaster has the highest household income ($135k).
Cherryfield has the most affordable homes ($196k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Lancaster | Cherryfield |
|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||
| People | ||
| Population | 8,606Highest |
809Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +4.8%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
-10.1%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 43.1±4.9Lowest 11% above U.S. |
58.1±4.2Highest 49% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 19.2%±4Highest U.S.: 22% |
11.6%±5.3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Lancaster and Cherryfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Age 65+ | 19.9%±4.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
32.4%±9.6Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Cherryfield and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 50.3%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
21.4%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3%±1.8Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
1.7%±1.6Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Lancaster and Cherryfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Cost of living | ||
| Household incomemedian | $134,833±$27kHighest 67% above U.S. |
$37,115±$17kLowest 54% below U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $519,100±$60kHighest 56% above U.S. |
$195,800±$53kLowest 41% below U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $2,338±$539Highest 65% above U.S. |
$428±$107Lowest 70% below U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,235Highest 132% above U.S. |
$1,950Lowest 37% below U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 68.3%±36.7Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
60.5%±17.8Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Lancaster and Cherryfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Below poverty line | 1.4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
26.3%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | ||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 85.1%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
66.8%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971Lowest 9 yrs older than U.S. |
1977Highest 3 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | ||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minHighest 20% above U.S. |
30 minLowest 14% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 33.6%±9.1Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
18.2%±10.4Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Lancaster and Cherryfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Schools | ||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #145 of 282 in MA | — |
| School district | Nashoba | Cherryfield Public Schools |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | ||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.
