Compare towns
Kirby vs Windham vs Worcester vs Victory
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Kirby has the most kids (30% under 18).
Worcester has the most people working from home (23.6%).
Victory has the oldest population (median age 64.5).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Kirby | Windham | Worcester | Victory |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||||
| People | ||||
| Population | 756 |
594 |
831Highest |
53Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | — | -3.4% VT: +2.8% |
— |
| Median age | 38.8±7.1Lowest 10% below VT |
44.2±7.4 about the VT average |
47±2.7 9% above VT |
64.5±11.1Highest 50% above VT |
| Kids under 18 | 30%±5.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
17.5%±7.9 VT: 17.9% |
12.8%±3.9 VT: 17.9% |
7.5%±51Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Kirby and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Age 65+ | 19.2%±5.1Lowest VT: 21.4% |
23.2%±8.1 VT: 21.4% |
19.5%±2.5 VT: 21.4% |
47.2%±39.7Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Victory and Windham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 32.4% VT: 43.8% |
48.1% VT: 43.8% |
53%Highest VT: 43.8% |
26.5%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.6%±3.1 VT: 7% |
0.8%±1.1 VT: 7% |
6.9%±4.7Highest VT: 7% |
0%±26.7Lowest VT: 7% |
| Worcester and Kirby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Cost of living | ||||
| Household incomemedian | $54,792±$21kLowest 33% below VT |
$94,500±$12kHighest 16% above VT |
$73,833±$18k 9% below VT |
— |
| Windham and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $302,900±$63k 4% below VT |
$353,900±$20kHighest 12% above VT |
$271,100±$27kLowest 14% below VT |
— |
| Windham and Kirby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,250±$326Highest about the VT average |
— | $1,023±$136Lowest 17% below VT |
— |
| Kirby and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,597 9% below VT |
$5,951Highest 18% above VT |
$4,421 12% below VT |
$2,500Lowest 50% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 25%±100 VT: 48.4% |
41.2%±94Highest VT: 48.4% |
25.5%±37 VT: 48.4% |
0%±100Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Windham and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Below poverty line | 21.3% VT: 10.1% |
9.9% VT: 10.1% |
5.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
45.3%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | ||||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 93.5%Highest VT: 73.2% |
82.9% VT: 73.2% |
85.9% VT: 73.2% |
71.4%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1985 9 yrs newer than VT |
1982 6 yrs newer than VT |
1976Lowest same as VT |
1986Highest 10 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | ||||
| Average commuteone way | 34 minHighest 43% above VT |
27 min 14% above VT |
29 min 22% above VT |
27 minLowest 13% above VT |
| Work from home | 20.6%±9.3 VT: 16.9% |
20.5%±5.6 VT: 16.9% |
23.6%±4.8Highest VT: 16.9% |
0%±52.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Worcester and Kirby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Schools | ||||
| School district | — | — | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 | — |
| High school in town | — | — | None in town | — |
| On TownTapestry | ||||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.