Compare towns

Killingly vs Windsor vs Hanson vs Putnam

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Killingly has the youngest population (median age 39.5).
Windsor has the most people working from home (21.2%).
Hanson has the most expensive homes ($534k median).
Putnam has the most renters (40.2% rent).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureKillinglyWindsorHansonPutnam
People
Population
17,867Highest
1,065Lowest
10,660
9,292
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census —
-7.6%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
+4.2%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
—
Median age
39.5±3Lowest
about the U.S. average
44.8±6.4Highest
15% above U.S.
42.8±3
10% above U.S.
43.7±3
12% above U.S.
Windsor and Putnam are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
19.8%±2.3
U.S.: 22%
15.8%±5.1Lowest
U.S.: 22%
21.6%±3.7Highest
U.S.: 22%
18.6%±3.6
U.S.: 22%
Hanson and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
19.7%±2.4Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
18.6%±4.9
U.S.: 17.2%
19.7%±3Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
18.5%±3.1Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
22.9%
U.S.: 35.7%
41.5%
U.S.: 35.7%
42.6%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
20%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
5.4%±1.9Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
2.7%±1.7Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
4.8%±2.2
U.S.: 6.4%
3.9%±1.4
U.S.: 6.4%
Killingly and Hanson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$84,350±$8k
4% above U.S.
$115,563±$10k
43% above U.S.
$132,200±$10kHighest
64% above U.S.
$70,561±$7kLowest
13% below U.S.
Hanson and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$288,600±$15k
13% below U.S.
$389,700±$32k
17% above U.S.
$533,900±$36kHighest
60% above U.S.
$269,200±$11kLowest
19% below U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,044±$141Lowest
26% below U.S.
—
$1,821±$860Highest
29% above U.S.
$1,149±$44
19% below U.S.
Hanson and Putnam are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$3,922
26% above U.S.
$3,867
24% above U.S.
$6,402Highest
105% above U.S.
$3,860Lowest
24% above U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
42.8%±10.9
U.S.: 51.1%
0%±100Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
69%±33.1Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
37.7%±11.6
U.S.: 51.1%
Hanson and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
11.4%
U.S.: 12.5%
3.8%
U.S.: 12.5%
2.7%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
11.5%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
71.6%
U.S.: 65.2%
96.2%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
89%
U.S.: 65.2%
59.8%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1968
12 yrs older than U.S.
1970
10 yrs older than U.S.
1972Highest
8 yrs older than U.S.
1961Lowest
19 yrs older than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
28 min
6% above U.S.
37 minHighest
41% above U.S.
34 min
27% above U.S.
25 minLowest
6% below U.S.
Work from home
11.1%±2.3
U.S.: 15.1%
21.2%±5.8Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
7.9%±2.5Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
9%±2.8
U.S.: 15.1%
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #136 of 149 in CT — #149 of 282 in MA #128 of 149 in CT
School district Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS — Whitman-Hanson Putnam School District
High school in town Killingly High School — Whitman Hanson Regional Putnam High School
Students per teacherat that high school
11.1
—
14.7Highest
9.5Lowest
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.