Compare towns
Killingly vs Warren vs Westminster
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Killingly has the most affordable homes ($289k median).
Warren has the most renters (35.5% rent).
Westminster has the most expensive homes ($422k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Killingly | Warren | Westminster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 17,867Highest |
5,009Lowest |
8,374 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | -3.1%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+12.9%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 39.5±3 about the U.S. average |
38.7±7.3Lowest about the U.S. average |
48.3±4.6Highest 24% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 19.8%±2.3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
20.8%±8 U.S.: 22% |
21.3%±4.4Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Westminster and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.7%±2.4 U.S.: 17.2% |
14.6%±4.5Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
26%±5.7Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Westminster and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 22.9%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
23.2% U.S.: 35.7% |
45.9%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.4%±1.9Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
2.9%±2.1 U.S.: 6.4% |
1.8%±1.2Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Killingly and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $84,350±$8k 4% above U.S. |
$66,082±$6kLowest 18% below U.S. |
$106,331±$22kHighest 32% above U.S. |
| Westminster and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $288,600±$15kLowest 13% below U.S. |
$333,700±$35k about the U.S. average |
$422,000±$36kHighest 27% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,044±$141 26% below U.S. |
$890±$174Lowest 37% below U.S. |
$1,843±$268Highest 30% above U.S. |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,922Lowest 26% above U.S. |
$4,530 45% above U.S. |
$4,973Highest 59% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 42.8%±10.9 U.S.: 51.1% |
29.7%±18.4Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
60%±27.3Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Westminster and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 11.4%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
9% U.S.: 12.5% |
2.3%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 71.6% U.S.: 65.2% |
64.5%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
87.6%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1968Lowest 12 yrs older than U.S. |
1975 5 yrs older than U.S. |
1977Highest 3 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 min 6% above U.S. |
33 minHighest 25% above U.S. |
27 minLowest about the U.S. average |
| Work from home | 11.1%±2.3 U.S.: 15.1% |
8.5%±5.4Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
12.5%±4.2Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Westminster and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #136 of 149 in CT | #165 of 282 in MA | #112 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS | Quaboag Regional | Ashburnham-Westminster |
| High school in town | Killingly High School | Quaboag Regional High | Oakmont Regional High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 11.1 |
10.0Lowest |
13.6Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.