Compare towns
Killingly vs Roxbury vs Woodmont
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Connecticut.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Killingly has the most affordable homes ($289k median).
Roxbury has the most expensive homes ($715k median).
Woodmont has the most people working from home (18.8%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Killingly | Roxbury | Woodmont |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 17,867Highest |
2,185 |
1,661Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | — | -0.1% CT: +0.9% |
| Median age | 39.5±3Lowest 4% below CT |
54.7±1.8Highest 33% above CT |
52.7±3.1 28% above CT |
| Roxbury and Woodmont are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.8%±2.3Highest CT: 20.2% |
14.3%±4Lowest CT: 20.2% |
14.8%±4.3 CT: 20.2% |
| Killingly and Woodmont are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.7%±2.4Lowest CT: 18.5% |
31%±5.5Highest CT: 18.5% |
30.9%±3 CT: 18.5% |
| Roxbury and Woodmont are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 22.9%Lowest CT: 42.5% |
65.2%Highest CT: 42.5% |
57.8% CT: 42.5% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.4%±1.9 CT: 7.1% |
5.8%±3.3Highest CT: 7.1% |
3.4%±2Lowest CT: 7.1% |
| Roxbury and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $84,350±$8kLowest 12% below CT |
$123,864±$27kHighest 29% above CT |
$91,250±$26k 5% below CT |
| Roxbury and Woodmont are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $288,600±$15kLowest 21% below CT |
$714,500±$77kHighest 95% above CT |
$467,900±$48k 28% above CT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,044±$141Lowest 30% below CT |
$1,713±$418 15% above CT |
$1,877±$182Highest 26% above CT |
| Woodmont and Roxbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,922Lowest 41% below CT |
$6,591 about the CT average |
$7,901Highest 19% above CT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 42.8%±10.9 CT: 52.6% |
61.5%±48.3Highest CT: 52.6% |
42.3%±21.7Lowest CT: 52.6% |
| Roxbury and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 11.4%Highest CT: 10% |
3.7% CT: 10% |
1.9%Lowest CT: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 71.6%Lowest CT: 66.5% |
82.7%Highest CT: 66.5% |
82.4% CT: 66.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1968 1 yr newer than CT |
1981Highest 14 yrs newer than CT |
1938Lowest 29 yrs older than CT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 minLowest 5% above CT |
37 minHighest 38% above CT |
29 min 10% above CT |
| Work from home | 11.1%±2.3Lowest CT: 16% |
17.4%±6.6 CT: 16% |
18.8%±5.6Highest CT: 16% |
| Woodmont and Roxbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #136 of 149 in CT | — | — |
| School district | Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS | Regional School District 12 | — |
| High school in town | Killingly High School | None in town | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 11.1 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
CT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.


