Compare towns

Killingly vs Prospect vs Putnam vs Danielson

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Connecticut.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Killingly has the most people working from home (11.1%).
Prospect has the highest household income ($126k).
Putnam has the shortest commute (25 min average).
Danielson has the most affordable homes ($225k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureKillinglyProspectPutnamDanielson
People
Population
17,867Highest
9,458
9,292
4,209Lowest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census — — —
+2.6%
CT: +0.9%
Median age
39.5±3
4% below CT
46.8±3.9Highest
14% above CT
43.7±3
6% above CT
34.5±3.6Lowest
16% below CT
Prospect and Putnam are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
19.8%±2.3
CT: 20.2%
21.4%±4.1Highest
CT: 20.2%
18.6%±3.6Lowest
CT: 20.2%
18.9%±6.1
CT: 20.2%
Prospect and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
19.7%±2.4
CT: 18.5%
24.5%±4.3Highest
CT: 18.5%
18.5%±3.1
CT: 18.5%
13.6%±4.9Lowest
CT: 18.5%
Prospect and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
22.9%
CT: 42.5%
40.3%Highest
CT: 42.5%
20%
CT: 42.5%
11.5%Lowest
CT: 42.5%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
5.4%±1.9
CT: 7.1%
3.5%±1.8Lowest
CT: 7.1%
3.9%±1.4
CT: 7.1%
9.2%±6.6Highest
CT: 7.1%
Danielson and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$84,350±$8k
12% below CT
$126,394±$18kHighest
32% above CT
$70,561±$7k
26% below CT
$64,050±$15kLowest
33% below CT
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$288,600±$15k
21% below CT
$355,400±$21kHighest
3% below CT
$269,200±$11k
27% below CT
$224,600±$13kLowest
39% below CT
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,044±$141Lowest
30% below CT
$1,800±$433Highest
21% above CT
$1,149±$44
23% below CT
$1,235±$194
17% below CT
Prospect and Danielson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$3,922
41% below CT
$6,504Highest
about the CT average
$3,860Lowest
42% below CT
$4,009
40% below CT
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
42.8%±10.9
CT: 52.6%
45.3%±31.8Highest
CT: 52.6%
37.7%±11.6Lowest
CT: 52.6%
44.7%±17.1
CT: 52.6%
Prospect and Danielson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
11.4%
CT: 10%
3.2%Lowest
CT: 10%
11.5%
CT: 10%
21.1%Highest
CT: 10%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
71.6%
CT: 66.5%
93.5%Highest
CT: 66.5%
59.8%
CT: 66.5%
53%Lowest
CT: 66.5%
Typical home builtmedian year
1968
1 yr newer than CT
1974Highest
7 yrs newer than CT
1961
6 yrs older than CT
1951Lowest
16 yrs older than CT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
28 min
5% above CT
28 min
4% above CT
25 minLowest
6% below CT
28 minHighest
7% above CT
Work from home
11.1%±2.3Highest
CT: 16%
10.1%±3.2
CT: 16%
9%±2.8
CT: 16%
6.6%±5.3Lowest
CT: 16%
Killingly and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #136 of 149 in CT #50 of 149 in CT #128 of 149 in CT —
School district Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS Regional School District 16 Putnam School District —
High school in town Killingly High School None in town Putnam High School —
Students per teacherat that high school
11.1Highest
—
9.5Lowest
—
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

CT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.