Compare towns

Killingly vs Naugatuck vs Prospect vs Torrington

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Connecticut.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Killingly has the youngest population (median age 39.5).
Naugatuck has the most people working from home (15%).
Prospect has the highest household income ($126k).
Torrington has the most affordable homes ($216k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureKillinglyNaugatuckProspectTorrington
People
Population
17,867
31,800
9,458Lowest
35,547Highest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census —
-1.1%Highest
CT: +0.9%
—
-2.4%Lowest
CT: +0.9%
Median age
39.5±3Lowest
4% below CT
39.8±2.4
3% below CT
46.8±3.9Highest
14% above CT
42.9±1.8
4% above CT
Prospect and Torrington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
19.8%±2.3
CT: 20.2%
19.9%±2.3
CT: 20.2%
21.4%±4.1Highest
CT: 20.2%
17.9%±1.6Lowest
CT: 20.2%
Prospect and Naugatuck are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
19.7%±2.4
CT: 18.5%
15.6%±2Lowest
CT: 18.5%
24.5%±4.3Highest
CT: 18.5%
19.2%±1.5
CT: 18.5%
Prospect and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
22.9%Lowest
CT: 42.5%
32.2%
CT: 42.5%
40.3%Highest
CT: 42.5%
24.8%
CT: 42.5%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
5.4%±1.9
CT: 7.1%
7.8%±1.7Highest
CT: 7.1%
3.5%±1.8Lowest
CT: 7.1%
4.7%±1.1
CT: 7.1%
Naugatuck and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$84,350±$8k
12% below CT
$96,324±$9k
about the CT average
$126,394±$18kHighest
32% above CT
$70,856±$5kLowest
26% below CT
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$288,600±$15k
21% below CT
$259,100±$13k
29% below CT
$355,400±$21kHighest
3% below CT
$215,500±$8kLowest
41% below CT
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,044±$141Lowest
30% below CT
$1,369±$58
8% below CT
$1,800±$433Highest
21% above CT
$1,169±$43
21% below CT
Prospect and Naugatuck are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$3,922Lowest
41% below CT
$6,362
4% below CT
$6,504Highest
about the CT average
$5,042
24% below CT
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
42.8%±10.9
CT: 52.6%
42.2%±9.4Lowest
CT: 52.6%
45.3%±31.8
CT: 52.6%
48%±6.3Highest
CT: 52.6%
Torrington and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
11.4%
CT: 10%
6.3%
CT: 10%
3.2%Lowest
CT: 10%
13.7%Highest
CT: 10%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
71.6%
CT: 66.5%
67.8%
CT: 66.5%
93.5%Highest
CT: 66.5%
66.1%Lowest
CT: 66.5%
Typical home builtmedian year
1968
1 yr newer than CT
1971
4 yrs newer than CT
1974Highest
7 yrs newer than CT
1960Lowest
7 yrs older than CT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
28 min
5% above CT
33 minHighest
26% above CT
28 min
4% above CT
25 minLowest
6% below CT
Work from home
11.1%±2.3
CT: 16%
15%±2.8Highest
CT: 16%
10.1%±3.2
CT: 16%
9%±1.6Lowest
CT: 16%
Naugatuck and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #136 of 149 in CT #116 of 149 in CT #50 of 149 in CT #132 of 149 in CT
School district Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS Naugatuck School District Regional School District 16 Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Torrington School District
High school in town Killingly High School Naugatuck High School None in town Torrington High School
Students per teacherat that high school
11.1Lowest
15.2Highest
—
11.9
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

CT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.