Compare towns

Killingly vs Naugatuck vs Lancaster vs Putnam

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Killingly has the youngest population (median age 39.5).
Naugatuck has the most affordable homes ($259k median).
Lancaster has the most people working from home (33.6%).
Putnam has the most renters (40.2% rent).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureKillinglyNaugatuckLancasterPutnam
People
Population
17,867
31,800Highest
8,606Lowest
9,292
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census —
-1.1%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
+4.8%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
—
Median age
39.5±3Lowest
about the U.S. average
39.8±2.4
about the U.S. average
43.1±4.9
11% above U.S.
43.7±3Highest
12% above U.S.
Putnam and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
19.8%±2.3
U.S.: 22%
19.9%±2.3Highest
U.S.: 22%
19.2%±4
U.S.: 22%
18.6%±3.6Lowest
U.S.: 22%
Naugatuck and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
19.7%±2.4
U.S.: 17.2%
15.6%±2Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
19.9%±4.2Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
18.5%±3.1
U.S.: 17.2%
Lancaster and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
22.9%
U.S.: 35.7%
32.2%
U.S.: 35.7%
50.3%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
20%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
5.4%±1.9
U.S.: 6.4%
7.8%±1.7Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
3%±1.8Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
3.9%±1.4
U.S.: 6.4%
Naugatuck and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$84,350±$8k
4% above U.S.
$96,324±$9k
19% above U.S.
$134,833±$27kHighest
67% above U.S.
$70,561±$7kLowest
13% below U.S.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$288,600±$15k
13% below U.S.
$259,100±$13kLowest
22% below U.S.
$519,100±$60kHighest
56% above U.S.
$269,200±$11k
19% below U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,044±$141Lowest
26% below U.S.
$1,369±$58
3% below U.S.
$2,338±$539Highest
65% above U.S.
$1,149±$44
19% below U.S.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$3,922
26% above U.S.
$6,362
104% above U.S.
$7,235Highest
132% above U.S.
$3,860Lowest
24% above U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
42.8%±10.9
U.S.: 51.1%
42.2%±9.4
U.S.: 51.1%
68.3%±36.7Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
37.7%±11.6Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
Lancaster and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
11.4%
U.S.: 12.5%
6.3%
U.S.: 12.5%
1.4%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
11.5%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
71.6%
U.S.: 65.2%
67.8%
U.S.: 65.2%
85.1%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
59.8%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1968
12 yrs older than U.S.
1971Highest
9 yrs older than U.S.
1971Highest
9 yrs older than U.S.
1961Lowest
19 yrs older than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
28 min
6% above U.S.
33 minHighest
26% above U.S.
32 min
20% above U.S.
25 minLowest
6% below U.S.
Work from home
11.1%±2.3
U.S.: 15.1%
15%±2.8
U.S.: 15.1%
33.6%±9.1Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
9%±2.8Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #136 of 149 in CT #116 of 149 in CT #145 of 282 in MA #128 of 149 in CT
School district Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS Naugatuck School District Nashoba Putnam School District
High school in town Killingly High School Naugatuck High School None in town Putnam High School
Students per teacherat that high school
11.1
15.2Highest
—
9.5Lowest
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.