Compare towns
Killingly vs Middlebury vs Prospect
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Connecticut.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Killingly has the most affordable homes ($289k median).
Middlebury has the most people working from home (15.3%).
Prospect has the most homeowners (93.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Killingly | Middlebury | Prospect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 17,867Highest |
7,807Lowest |
9,458 |
| Median age | 39.5±3Lowest 4% below CT |
44.4±2.3 8% above CT |
46.8±3.9Highest 14% above CT |
| Prospect and Middlebury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.8%±2.3Lowest CT: 20.2% |
22%±3.8Highest CT: 20.2% |
21.4%±4.1 CT: 20.2% |
| Middlebury and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.7%±2.4Lowest CT: 18.5% |
22.7%±4.2 CT: 18.5% |
24.5%±4.3Highest CT: 18.5% |
| Prospect and Middlebury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 22.9%Lowest CT: 42.5% |
53.3%Highest CT: 42.5% |
40.3% CT: 42.5% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.4%±1.9 CT: 7.1% |
5.8%±2.8Highest CT: 7.1% |
3.5%±1.8Lowest CT: 7.1% |
| Middlebury and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $84,350±$8kLowest 12% below CT |
$133,487±$26kHighest 39% above CT |
$126,394±$18k 32% above CT |
| Middlebury and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $288,600±$15kLowest 21% below CT |
$476,400±$23kHighest 30% above CT |
$355,400±$21k 3% below CT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,044±$141 30% below CT |
$398±$387Lowest 73% below CT |
$1,800±$433Highest 21% above CT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,922Lowest 41% below CT |
$8,434Highest 27% above CT |
$6,504 about the CT average |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 42.8%±10.9 CT: 52.6% |
12.7%±6.9Lowest CT: 52.6% |
45.3%±31.8Highest CT: 52.6% |
| Prospect and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 11.4%Highest CT: 10% |
5.8% CT: 10% |
3.2%Lowest CT: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 71.6%Lowest CT: 66.5% |
87.8% CT: 66.5% |
93.5%Highest CT: 66.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1968Lowest 1 yr newer than CT |
1976Highest 9 yrs newer than CT |
1974 7 yrs newer than CT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 minHighest 5% above CT |
25 minLowest 5% below CT |
28 min 4% above CT |
| Work from home | 11.1%±2.3 CT: 16% |
15.3%±3.2Highest CT: 16% |
10.1%±3.2Lowest CT: 16% |
| Middlebury and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #136 of 149 in CT | #55 of 149 in CT | #50 of 149 in CT |
| School district | Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS | Regional School District 15 | Regional School District 16 |
| High school in town | Killingly High School | None in town | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 11.1 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
CT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.