Compare towns
Killingly vs Glocester vs Hanson
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Killingly has the most affordable homes ($289k median).
Glocester has the oldest population (median age 50.8).
Hanson has the most expensive homes ($534k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Killingly | Glocester | Hanson |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 17,867Highest |
10,221Lowest |
10,660 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | +2.3%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+4.2%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 39.5±3Lowest about the U.S. average |
50.8±4.3Highest 31% above U.S. |
42.8±3 10% above U.S. |
| Kids under 18 | 19.8%±2.3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
19.8%±4.3Lowest U.S.: 22% |
21.6%±3.7Highest U.S.: 22% |
| Hanson and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 19.7%±2.4Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
22.2%±3.4Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
19.7%±3Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Glocester and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 22.9%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
35.7% U.S.: 35.7% |
42.6%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 5.4%±1.9Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
4.3%±1.9Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
4.8%±2.2 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Killingly and Hanson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $84,350±$8kLowest 4% above U.S. |
$113,508±$7k 41% above U.S. |
$132,200±$10kHighest 64% above U.S. |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $288,600±$15kLowest 13% below U.S. |
$396,500±$28k 19% above U.S. |
$533,900±$36kHighest 60% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,044±$141Lowest 26% below U.S. |
$1,417±$627 about the U.S. average |
$1,821±$860Highest 29% above U.S. |
| Hanson and Glocester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,922Lowest 26% above U.S. |
$5,248 68% above U.S. |
$6,402Highest 105% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 42.8%±10.9Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
64.5%±24 U.S.: 51.1% |
69%±33.1Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Hanson and Glocester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 11.4%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
4.8% U.S.: 12.5% |
2.7%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 71.6%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
91%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
89% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1968Lowest 12 yrs older than U.S. |
1975Highest 5 yrs older than U.S. |
1972 8 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 minLowest 6% above U.S. |
34 minHighest 30% above U.S. |
34 min 27% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 11.1%±2.3 U.S.: 15.1% |
13.1%±4.7Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
7.9%±2.5Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Glocester and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #136 of 149 in CT | #12 of 38 in RI | #149 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS | Foster-Glocester · Glocester | Whitman-Hanson |
| High school in town | Killingly High School | Ponaganset High School | Whitman Hanson Regional |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 11.1Lowest |
12.8 |
14.7Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.